Trends in aortic valve replacement for elderly patients in the United States, 1999-2011
- PMID: 24240935
- PMCID: PMC4089974
- DOI: 10.1001/jama.2013.282437
Trends in aortic valve replacement for elderly patients in the United States, 1999-2011
Abstract
Importance: There is a need to describe contemporary outcomes of surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR) as the population ages and transcatheter options emerge.
Objective: To assess procedure rates and outcomes of surgical AVR over time.
Design, setting, and participants: A serial cross-sectional cohort study of 82,755,924 Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries undergoing AVR in the United States between 1999 and 2011.
Main outcomes and measures: Procedure rates for surgical AVR alone and with coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery, 30-day and 1-year mortality, and 30-day readmission rates.
Results: The AVR procedure rate increased by 19 (95% CI, 19-20) procedures per 100,000 person-years over the 12-year period (P<.001), with an age-, sex-, and race-adjusted rate increase of 1.6% (95% CI, 1.0%-1.8%) per year. Mortality decreased at 30 days (absolute decrease, 3.4%; 95% CI, 3.0%-3.8%; adjusted annual decrease, 4.1%; 95% CI, 3.7%- 4.4%) per year and at 1 year (absolute decrease, 2.6%; 95% CI, 2.1%-3.2%; adjusted annual decrease, 2.5%; 95% CI, 2.3%-2.8%). Thirty-day all-cause readmission also decreased by 1.1% (95% CI, 0.9%-1.3%) per year. Aortic valve replacement with CABG surgery decreased, women and black patients had lower procedure and higher mortality rates, and mechanical prosethetic implants decreased, but 23.9% of patients 85 years and older continued to receive a mechanical prosthesis in 2011.
Conclusions and relevance: Between 1999 and 2011, the rate of surgical AVR for elderly patients in the United States increased and outcomes improved substantially. Medicare data preclude the identification of the causes of the findings and the trends in procedure rates and outcomes cannot be causally linked. Nevertheless, the findings may be a useful benchmark for outcomes with surgical AVR for older patients eligible for surgery considering newer transcatheter treatments.
Conflict of interest statement
Comment in
-
Improving outlook for elderly patients with aortic stenosis.JAMA. 2013 Nov 20;310(19):2045-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.281825. JAMA. 2013. PMID: 24240930 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Outcomes following transcatheter aortic valve replacement in the United States.JAMA. 2013 Nov 20;310(19):2069-77. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.282043. JAMA. 2013. PMID: 24240934
-
Race, neighborhood disadvantage, and survival of Medicare beneficiaries after aortic valve replacement and concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2024 Jun;167(6):2076-2090.e19. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2023.02.005. Epub 2023 Feb 13. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2024. PMID: 36894351
-
Long-term survival after aortic valve replacement among high-risk elderly patients in the United States: insights from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database, 1991 to 2007.Circulation. 2012 Sep 25;126(13):1621-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.091371. Epub 2012 Aug 20. Circulation. 2012. PMID: 22907936
-
Basic data from 176 studies on the immediate outcome after aortic valve replacement with or without coronary artery bypass surgery.J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2014 Oct;28(5):1251-6. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2013.07.020. Epub 2013 Nov 28. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2014. PMID: 24290746 Review.
-
Predictors and Outcomes of Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch After Aortic Valve Replacement.JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Aug;9(8):924-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2015.10.026. Epub 2016 May 25. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016. PMID: 27236530 Review.
Cited by
-
Effect of Sex and Flow Status on Outcomes After Surgical or Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.JACC Adv. 2024 Feb 16;3(3):100853. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2024.100853. eCollection 2024 Mar. JACC Adv. 2024. PMID: 38938841 Free PMC article.
-
Administrative Model for Profiling Hospital Performance on Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: Based on the Chinese Hospital Quality Monitoring System.J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Feb 6;13(3):e031924. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.031924. Epub 2024 Jan 19. J Am Heart Assoc. 2024. PMID: 38240224 Free PMC article.
-
Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Aortic Valve Replacement Among Medicare Beneficiaries in the United States, 2012-2019.Am J Med. 2024 Apr;137(4):321-330.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2023.12.026. Epub 2024 Jan 6. Am J Med. 2024. PMID: 38190959
-
Racial, Ethnic, and Gender Disparities in Valvular Heart Failure Management.Heart Fail Clin. 2023 Jul;19(3):379-390. doi: 10.1016/j.hfc.2023.02.009. Epub 2023 Apr 8. Heart Fail Clin. 2023. PMID: 37230651 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Aortic Stenosis and Outcomes in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Nationwide Cohort Study.J Am Heart Assoc. 2023 May 2;12(9):e029337. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.029337. Epub 2023 Apr 29. J Am Heart Assoc. 2023. PMID: 37119067 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Carabello BA, Paulus WJ. Aortic stenosis. Lancet. 2009;373(9667):956–966. - PubMed
-
- Iung B, Baron G, Butchart EG, et al. A prospective survey of patients with valvular heart disease in Europe: The Euro Heart Survey on Valvular Heart Disease. Eur Heart J. 2003;24(13):1231–1243. - PubMed
-
- Rosamond W, Flegal K, Furie K, et al. American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Heart disease and stroke statistics—2008 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Circulation. 2008;117(4):e25–e146. - PubMed
-
- Supino PG, Borer JS, Preibisz J, Bornstein A. The epidemiology of valvular heart disease: a growing public health problem. Heart Fail Clin. 2006;2(4):379–393. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
