Disparities in endoscopy use for colorectal cancer screening in the United States
- PMID: 24248417
- DOI: 10.1007/s10620-013-2937-x
Disparities in endoscopy use for colorectal cancer screening in the United States
Abstract
It is well established that disparities exist for colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence rates and death. With screening, death from CRC may be considered a preventable occurrence. Endoscopy (flexible sigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy) is the only modality with therapeutic benefit of removal of pre-cancerous polyps. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act mandated that preventive screening services be covered, which includes endoscopy for colon cancer screening. Recent federal rules have eliminated cost sharing for polyp removal during screening colonoscopy in privately insured patients; however, this has not been mandated for Medicare patients. Understanding the current state of disparities in endoscopy use is important, as these policy changes will affect millions of patients. The purpose of this literature review was to summarize the known research on disparities in endoscopy use for colon cancer screening in the United States and highlight areas for future research.
Similar articles
-
What Happened to Disparities in CRC Screening Among FFS Medicare Enrollees Following Medicare Modernization?J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2019 Apr;6(2):273-291. doi: 10.1007/s40615-018-0522-x. Epub 2018 Sep 19. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2019. PMID: 30232793
-
Rural-urban disparities in colonoscopies after the elimination of patient cost-sharing by the Affordable Care Act.Prev Med. 2019 Dec;129:105877. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.105877. Epub 2019 Oct 24. Prev Med. 2019. PMID: 31669176
-
Association of local capacity for endoscopy with individual use of colorectal cancer screening and stage at diagnosis.Cancer. 2010 Jun 15;116(12):2922-31. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25093. Cancer. 2010. PMID: 20564398 Free PMC article.
-
Challenges and possible solutions to colorectal cancer screening for the underserved.J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014 Apr;106(4):dju032. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dju032. Epub 2014 Mar 28. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014. PMID: 24681602 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Progress of colorectal cancer screening in United States: Past achievements and future challenges.Prev Med. 2019 Mar;120:78-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.12.004. Epub 2018 Dec 21. Prev Med. 2019. PMID: 30579938 Review.
Cited by
-
Biomarker Testing Disparities in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jul 1;7(7):e2419142. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.19142. JAMA Netw Open. 2024. PMID: 38967928 Free PMC article.
-
Epigenetics and Colorectal Neoplasia: the Evidence for Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior.Curr Colorectal Cancer Rep. 2015 Dec;11(6):388-396. doi: 10.1007/s11888-015-0296-z. Epub 2015 Sep 19. Curr Colorectal Cancer Rep. 2015. PMID: 27212896 Free PMC article.
-
African Americans Have Better Outcomes for Five Common Gastrointestinal Diagnoses in Hospitals With More Racially Diverse Patients.Am J Gastroenterol. 2016 May;111(5):649-57. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2016.64. Epub 2016 Mar 22. Am J Gastroenterol. 2016. PMID: 27002802
-
Patient Test Preference for Colorectal Cancer Screening and Screening Uptake in an Insured Urban Minority Population.J Community Health. 2016 Jun;41(3):502-8. doi: 10.1007/s10900-015-0123-0. J Community Health. 2016. PMID: 26585609
-
Associations between circulating 1,25(OH)₂D concentration and odds of metachronous colorectal adenoma.Cancer Causes Control. 2014 Jul;25(7):809-17. doi: 10.1007/s10552-014-0382-6. Epub 2014 Apr 16. Cancer Causes Control. 2014. PMID: 24737199 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
