Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Nov 19;8(11):e79722.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079722. eCollection 2013.

MetAmyl: a METa-predictor for AMYLoid proteins

Affiliations

MetAmyl: a METa-predictor for AMYLoid proteins

Mathieu Emily et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

The aggregation of proteins or peptides in amyloid fibrils is associated with a number of clinical disorders, including Alzheimer's, Huntington's and prion diseases, medullary thyroid cancer, renal and cardiac amyloidosis. Despite extensive studies, the molecular mechanisms underlying the initiation of fibril formation remain largely unknown. Several lines of evidence revealed that short amino-acid segments (hot spots), located in amyloid precursor proteins act as seeds for fibril elongation. Therefore, hot spots are potential targets for diagnostic/therapeutic applications, and a current challenge in bioinformatics is the development of methods to accurately predict hot spots from protein sequences. In this paper, we combined existing methods into a meta-predictor for hot spots prediction, called MetAmyl for METapredictor for AMYLoid proteins. MetAmyl is based on a logistic regression model that aims at weighting predictions from a set of popular algorithms, statistically selected as being the most informative and complementary predictors. We evaluated the performances of MetAmyl through a large scale comparative study based on three independent datasets and thus demonstrated its ability to differentiate between amyloidogenic and non-amyloidogenic polypeptides. Compared to 9 other methods, MetAmyl provides significant improvement in prediction on studied datasets. We further show that MetAmyl is efficient to highlight the effect of point mutations involved in human amyloidosis, so we suggest this program should be a useful complementary tool for the diagnosis of these diseases.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC curves) obtained for the 4 selected predictors, PAFIG, SALSA, Fold Amyloid and Waltz, and Leave-One-Out cross validated MetAmyl on the training dataset.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Metamyl predictions applied to human fibrinogen-.
The effect of mutations is reported on a diagram where each column represents the difference of formula image scores between the mutant and the corresponding wild-type sequence. The analysis is limited to mutations affecting the fragment of 80 amino acids found in amyloid fibrils, which is the region 500–580 of the mature protein. In red are variants involved in renal amyloidosis. In blue are non-pathological variants.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Jiménez JL, Guijarro J, Orlova E, Zuro J, Dobson CM, et al. (1999) Cryo-electron microscopy structure of an sh3 amyloid fibril and model of the molecular packing. The EMBO Journal 18: 815–821. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ross CA, Poirier MA (2004) Protein aggregation and neurodegenerative disease. Nature Medicine 10: S10–S17. - PubMed
    1. Chiti F, Dobson CM (2006) Protein misfolding, functional amyloid, and human disease. Annual Review of Biochemistry 75: 333–366. - PubMed
    1. Dobson CM (2004) Experimental investigation of protein folding and misfolding. Methods 34: 4–14. - PubMed
    1. Nelson R, Eisenberg D (2006) Recent atomic models of amyloid fibril structure. Current Opinion in Structural Biology 16: 260–265. - PubMed

Publication types

Grants and funding

This work has been supported by Rennes Metropole, the Région Bretagne and the CNRS. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.