Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Jun;29(2):99-106.
doi: 10.5487/TR.2013.29.2.099.

In Vitro Evaluation of Antimicrobial Activity of Lactic Acid Bacteria against Clostridium difficile

Affiliations

In Vitro Evaluation of Antimicrobial Activity of Lactic Acid Bacteria against Clostridium difficile

Joong-Su Lee et al. Toxicol Res. 2013 Jun.

Abstract

Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) has become a significant threat to public health. Although broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy is the primary treatment option for CDI, its use has evident limitations. Probiotics have been proved to be effective in the treatment of CDI and are a promising therapeutic option for CDI. In this study, 4 strains of lactic acid bacteria (LAB), namely, Lactobacillus rhamnosus (LR5), Lactococcuslactis (SL3), Bifidobacterium breve (BR3), and Bifidobacterium lactis (BL3) were evaluated for their anti-C. difficile activity. Co-culture incubation of C. difficile (10(6) and 10(10) CFU/ml) with each strain of LAB indicated that SL3 possessed the highest antimicrobial activity over a 24-hr period. The cell-free supernatants of the 4 LAB strains exhibited MIC50 values between 0.424 mg/ml (SL3) and 1.318 (BR3) mg/ml. These results may provide a basis for alternative therapies for the treatment of C. difficile-associated gut disorders.

Keywords: Clostridium difficile infection; antimicrobial activity; cell-free supernatant; lactic acid bacteria.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.. EC50 of SL3, LR5, BL3 and BR3 co-cultured with Clostridium difficile KCCM 5009 in RCM broth anaerobically for 6 hr at 37℃. SL3 (A), LR5 (B), BL3 (C), and BR3 (D) at 108, 109, or 1010 CFU/ml were co-cultured with C. difficile at 106 CFU/ml for a simulation of disease prevention and SL3 (E), LR5 (F), BL3 (G), and BR3 (H) at 108, 109, or 1010 CFU/ml were co-cultured with C. difficile at 1010 CFU/ml for a simulation of disease treatment.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.. Flow cytometric analysis of C. difficile incubated with ½, 1, and 2 MIC cell-free supernatants of Lc. lactis SL3 for 24 hr. All bacteria were previously stained with STYO Green I and propidium iodide. Gates indicate the position and concentration of intact cells on the plots. Q2: live cell, Q1: dead cell, and Q3: injured cell and debris.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.. Flow cytometric analysis of C. difficile incubated with ½, 1, and 2 MIC cell-free supernatants of L. rhamnosus LR5 for 24 hr. All bacteria were previously stained with STYO Green I and propidium iodide. Gates indicate the position and concentration of intact cells on the plots. Q2: live cell, Q1: dead cell, and Q3: injured cell and debris.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.. Flow cytometric analysis of C. difficile incubated with ½, 1, and 2 MIC cell-free supernatants of B. lactis BL3 for 24 hr. All bacteria were previously stained with STYO Green I and propidium iodide. Gates indicate the position and concentration of intact cells on the plots. Q2: live cell, Q1: dead cell, and Q3: injured cell and debris.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5.. Flow cytometric analysis of C. difficile incubated with ½, 1, and 2 MIC cell-free supernatants of B. breve BR3 for 24 hr. All bacteria were previously stained with STYO Green I and propidium iodide. Gates indicate the position and concentration of intact cells on the plots. Q2: live cell, Q1: dead cell, and Q3: injured cell and debris.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 6.. Fluorescent microscopic images of C. difficile incubated with ½, 1, and 2 MIC cell-free supernatants of Lc. lactis SL3, L. rhamnosus LR5, B. lactis BL3, and B. breve BR3. C. difficile cells were stained with Live/Dead Baclight kit after incubation with the cell-free supernatants. Live cells: green, dead cells: red, yellow and orange: injured.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Aslam S., Hamill R.J., Musher D.M. Treatment of Clostridium difficile-associated disease: old therapies and new strategies. Lancet Infect. Dis. (2005);5:549–557. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(05)70215-2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nelson R. Antibiotic treatment for Clostridium difficile- associated diarrhea in adults. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. (2007);18:CD004610. - PubMed
    1. Bartlett J.G. Clostridium difficile: progress and challenges. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. (2010);1213:62–69. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05863.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ohl M.E., Stevermer J.J., Meadows S., Tribuna J., Chek K. What are effective therapies for Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea? J. Fam. Pract. (2005);54:176–178. - PubMed
    1. Dethlefsen L., Huse S., Sogin M.L., Relman D.A. The pervasive effects of an antibiotic on the human gut microbiota, as revealed by deep 16S rRNA sequencing. PLoS Biol. (2008);6:e280. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0060280. - DOI - PMC - PubMed