Airborne bacterial reduction by spraying slightly acidic electrolyzed water in a laying-hen house
- PMID: 24282973
- DOI: 10.1080/10962247.2013.812815
Airborne bacterial reduction by spraying slightly acidic electrolyzed water in a laying-hen house
Abstract
Spraying slightly acidic electrolyzed water (SAEW) has been considered as a potential approach to reduce airborne bacteria in laying-hen houses. In this study, the effects of spraying SAEW on airborne bacterial reduction were investigated in a laying-hen house as compared with using diluted didecyl dimethyl ammonium bromide (DDAB). Averaged air temperature reduced by approximate 1 degrees C and average relative humidity increased by 3% at a stable ventilation rate (about 2.5 m3 hr(-1) per bird) in the laying-hen house 30 min after spraying (120 mL m(-2)). Compared with the control without spraying, the airborne bacterial concentration was reduced by about 0.70 and 0.37 log10 colony-forming units (CFU) m(-3) in the 4 hr after spraying 120 mL m(-2) SAEW (available chlorine concentration [ACC] of 156 mg L(-1)) and diluted DDAB (active compound concentration of 167 mg L(-1)), respectively. Compared with spraying diluted DDAB, spraying SAEW was determined to be more effective for reducing airborne bacterial in laying-hen houses. The effects of spraying SAEW and diluted DDAB on airborne bacterial reduction in the laying-hen house increased with the increasing available chlorine concentrations for SAEW (156, 206, 262 mg L(-1)) and increasing active compound concentrations for diluted DDAB (167, 333, 500 mg L(-1)), respectively. Spraying SAEW and diluted DDAB with two levels of spraying volumes (120 and 90 mL m(-2)) both showed significant differences on airborne bacterial reduction in the laying-hen house (P < 0.05).
Similar articles
-
Slightly acidic electrolyzed water for reducing airborne microorganisms in a layer breeding house.J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2014 Apr;64(4):494-500. doi: 10.1080/10962247.2013.870940. J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2014. PMID: 24843920
-
Optimization of a wet scrubber with electrolyzed water spray-Part II: Airborne culturable bacteria removal.J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2019 May;69(5):603-610. doi: 10.1080/10962247.2019.1567622. Epub 2019 Mar 25. J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2019. PMID: 30633629
-
Reduction of microbial contamination on the surfaces of layer houses using slightly acidic electrolyzed water.Poult Sci. 2015 Nov;94(11):2838-48. doi: 10.3382/ps/pev261. Epub 2015 Sep 14. Poult Sci. 2015. PMID: 26371328
-
Free chlorine loss during spraying of membraneless acidic electrolyzed water and its antimicrobial effect on airborne bacteria from poultry house.Ann Agric Environ Med. 2014;21(2):249-55. doi: 10.5604/1232-1966.1108585. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2014. PMID: 24959770
-
Spatial disinfection potential of slightly acidic electrolyzed water.PLoS One. 2021 Jul 2;16(7):e0253595. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253595. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 34214092 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Kinetics of sterilization of atomized slightly acidic electrolyzed water on tableware.Heliyon. 2024 Jan 15;10(2):e24721. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24721. eCollection 2024 Jan 30. Heliyon. 2024. PMID: 38312634 Free PMC article.
-
Optimization and Effect of Water Hardness for the Production of Slightly Acidic Electrolyzed Water on Sanitization Efficacy.Front Microbiol. 2022 Mar 2;13:816671. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.816671. eCollection 2022. Front Microbiol. 2022. PMID: 35308354 Free PMC article.
-
Electrolyzed Water and Its Pharmacological Activities: A Mini-Review.Molecules. 2022 Feb 11;27(4):1222. doi: 10.3390/molecules27041222. Molecules. 2022. PMID: 35209015 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Effectiveness of slightly acidic electrolyzed water on bacteria reduction: in vitro and spray evaluation.PeerJ. 2020 Feb 18;8:e8593. doi: 10.7717/peerj.8593. eCollection 2020. PeerJ. 2020. PMID: 32110494 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical