Risk factors for early revision after total hip arthroplasty
- PMID: 24285406
- PMCID: PMC4269321
- DOI: 10.1002/acr.22240
Risk factors for early revision after total hip arthroplasty
Abstract
Objective: Revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) is associated with increased cost, morbidity, and technical challenge compared to primary THA. A better understanding of the risk factors for early revision is needed to inform strategies to optimize patient outcomes.
Methods: A total of 207,256 patients who underwent primary THA between 1997-2005 in California and New York were identified from statewide databases. Unique patient identifiers were used to identify early revision THA (<10 years from index procedure). Patient characteristics (demographics, comorbidities, insurance type, and preoperative diagnosis), community characteristics (education level, poverty, and population density), and hospital characteristics (annual THA volume, bed size, and teaching status) were evaluated using multivariable regression to determine risk factors for early revision.
Results: The probabilities of undergoing early aseptic revision and early septic revision were 4% and <1% at 5 years, respectively. Women were 29% less likely than men to undergo early septic revision (P < 0.001). Patients with Medicaid and Medicare were 91% and 24%, respectively, more likely to undergo early septic revision than privately insured patients (P = 0.01 and P < 0.001, respectively). Hospitals performing <200 THAs annually had a 34% increased risk of early aseptic revision compared to hospitals performing >400 THAs annually (P < 0.001).
Conclusion: A number of identifiable factors, including younger age, Medicaid, and low hospital volume, increase the risk of undergoing early revision THA. Patient-level characteristics distinctly affect the risk of revision within 10 years, particularly if due to infection. Our findings reinforce the need for continued investigation of the predictors of early failure following THA.
Copyright © 2014 by the American College of Rheumatology.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Comparative Epidemiology of Revision Arthroplasty: Failed THA Poses Greater Clinical and Economic Burdens Than Failed TKA.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Jun;473(6):2131-8. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-4078-8. Epub 2014 Dec 3. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015. PMID: 25467789 Free PMC article.
-
The Lawrence D. Dorr Surgical Techniques & Technologies Award: Conversion Total Hip Arthroplasty: Is it a Primary or Revision Hip Arthroplasty.J Arthroplasty. 2016 Sep;31(9 Suppl):16-21. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.06.024. Epub 2015 Jun 20. J Arthroplasty. 2016. PMID: 26160646
-
Short-term Risk of Revision THA in the Medicare Population Has Not Improved With Time.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Jan;474(1):156-63. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4520-6. Epub 2015 Sep 23. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016. PMID: 26400249 Free PMC article.
-
Increased Mortality After Prosthetic Joint Infection in Primary THA.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Nov;475(11):2623-2631. doi: 10.1007/s11999-017-5289-6. Epub 2017 Feb 24. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017. PMID: 28236084 Free PMC article.
-
Outcomes of different bearings in total hip arthroplasty - implant survival, revision causes, and patient-reported outcome.Dan Med J. 2017 Mar;64(3):B5350. Dan Med J. 2017. PMID: 28260601 Review.
Cited by
-
Mid-term clinical outcomes of the uncemented Robert Mathys pressfit cup.World J Clin Cases. 2024 Jul 6;12(19):3684-3691. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i19.3684. World J Clin Cases. 2024. PMID: 38994294 Free PMC article.
-
Diagnostic value of procalcitonin in patients with periprosthetic joint infection: a diagnostic meta-analysis.Front Surg. 2024 Apr 10;11:1211325. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1211325. eCollection 2024. Front Surg. 2024. PMID: 38660585 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Developing Patient-Specific Statistical Reconstructions of Healthy Anatomical Structures to Improve Patient Outcomes.Bioengineering (Basel). 2023 Jan 17;10(2):123. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering10020123. Bioengineering (Basel). 2023. PMID: 36829617 Free PMC article.
-
Association of Sex With Risk of 2-Year Revision Among Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty.JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jun 1;4(6):e2110687. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.10687. JAMA Netw Open. 2021. PMID: 34076699 Free PMC article.
-
Medium term outcome of Lancaster cortical window technique for extraction of femoral stem in revision hip arthroplasty.J Orthop Surg Res. 2021 May 17;16(1):314. doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02458-7. J Orthop Surg Res. 2021. PMID: 34001274 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Apr;89(4):780–5. - PubMed
-
- Kurtz SM, Ong KL, Schmier J, Mowat F, Saleh K, Dybvik E, et al. Future clinical and economic impact of revision total hip and knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Oct;89(Suppl 3):144–51. - PubMed
-
- Dorr LD, Takei GK, Conaty JP. Total hip arthroplasties in patients less than forty-five years old. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1983 Apr;65(4):474–9. - PubMed
-
- Broos P, Fourneau I. Host factors that affect outcome of total hip arthroplasty. Lancet. 2000 Apr 29;355(9214):1479–80. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
