Systematic review of robotic surgery in gynecology: robotic techniques compared with laparoscopy and laparotomy

J Minim Invasive Gynecol. May-Jun 2014;21(3):353-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2013.11.010. Epub 2013 Dec 1.

Abstract

The Society of Gynecologic Surgeons Systematic Review Group performed a systematic review of both randomized and observational studies to compare robotic vs nonrobotic surgical approaches (laparoscopic, abdominal, and vaginal) for treatment of both benign and malignant gynecologic indications to compare surgical and patient-centered outcomes, costs, and adverse events associated with the various surgical approaches. MEDLINE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from inception to May 15, 2012, for English-language studies with terms related to robotic surgery and gynecology. Studies of any design that included at least 30 women who had undergone robotic-assisted laparoscopic gynecologic surgery were included for review. The literature yielded 1213 citations, of which 97 full-text articles were reviewed. Forty-four studies (30 comparative and 14 noncomparative) met eligibility criteria. Study data were extracted into structured electronic forms and reconciled by a second, independent reviewer. Our analysis revealed that, compared with open surgery, robotic surgery consistently confers shorter hospital stay. The proficiency plateau seems to be lower for robotic surgery than for conventional laparoscopy. Of the various gynecologic applications, there seems to be evidence that renders robotic techniques advantageous over traditional open surgery for management of endometrial cancer. However, insofar as superiority, conflicting data are obtained when comparing robotics vs laparoscopic techniques. Therefore, the specific method of minimally invasive surgery, whether conventional laparoscopy or robotic surgery, should be tailored to patient selection, surgeon ability, and equipment availability.

Keywords: Gynecologic surgery; Learning curve; Robotic surgery; Systematic review.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Review
  • Systematic Review

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Endometrial Neoplasms / surgery
  • Female
  • Gynecologic Surgical Procedures / adverse effects
  • Gynecologic Surgical Procedures / economics
  • Gynecologic Surgical Procedures / methods*
  • Gynecologic Surgical Procedures / statistics & numerical data
  • Gynecology
  • Humans
  • Laparoscopy / adverse effects
  • Laparoscopy / economics
  • Laparoscopy / statistics & numerical data*
  • Laparotomy / adverse effects
  • Laparotomy / economics
  • Laparotomy / statistics & numerical data*
  • Learning Curve
  • Length of Stay
  • Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures
  • Observational Studies as Topic
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • Robotics / economics
  • Robotics / statistics & numerical data*
  • Uterine Neoplasms / surgery*