Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jan;133(1):25-9.
doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2013.09.011. Epub 2013 Sep 16.

Risk factors for inpatient venous thromboembolism despite thromboprophylaxis

Affiliations

Risk factors for inpatient venous thromboembolism despite thromboprophylaxis

Tzu-Fei Wang et al. Thromb Res. 2014 Jan.

Abstract

Introduction: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is the most common preventable cause of morbidity and mortality in the hospital. Adequate thromboprophylaxis has reduced the rate of hospital-acquired VTE substantially; however, some inpatients still develop VTE even when they are prescribed thromboprophylaxis. Predictors associated with thromboprophylaxis failure are unclear. In this study, we aimed to identify risk factors for inpatient VTE despite thromboprophylaxis.

Materials and methods: We conducted a case-control study to identify independent predictors for inpatient VTE. Among patients discharged from the BJC HealthCare system between January 2010 and May 2011, we matched 94 cases who developed in-hospital VTE while taking thromboprophylaxis to 272 controls who did not develop VTE. Matching was done by hospital, patient age, month and year of discharge. We used multivariate conditional logistic regression to develop a VTE prediction model.

Results: We identified five independent risk factors for in-hospital VTE despite thromboprophylaxis: hospitalization for cranial surgery, intensive care unit admission, admission leukocyte count >13,000/mm(3), presence of an indwelling central venous catheter, and admission from a long-term care facility.

Conclusions: We identified five risk factors associated with the development of VTE despite thromboprophylaxis in the hospital setting. By recognizing these high-risk patients, clinicians can prescribe aggressive VTE prophylaxis judiciously and remain vigilant for signs or symptoms of VTE.

Keywords: AHRQ PSI 12; Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Patient Safety Indicators 12, version 4.2; Anticoagulation; CI; CVC; DVT; ICU; INR; MEDENOX trial; OR; PE; Risk factors; Thromboprophylaxis; VTE; Venous thromboembolism; central venous catheter; confidence interval; deep vein thrombosis; intensive care unit; international normalized ratio; odds ratio; pulmonary embolism; venous thromboembolism; “prophylaxis in medical patients with enoxaparin” trial.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest

All authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Horlander KT, Mannino DM, Leeper KV. Pulmonary embolism mortality in the United States, 1979–1998: an analysis using multiple-cause mortality data. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163:1711–7. - PubMed
    1. Goldhaber SZ, Visani L, De Rosa M. Acute pulmonary embolism: clinical outcomes in the International Cooperative Pulmonary Embolism Registry (ICOPER) Lancet. 1999;353:1386–9. - PubMed
    1. Dentali F, Douketis JD, Gianni M, Lim W, Crowther MA. Meta-analysis: anticoagulant prophylaxis to prevent symptomatic venous thromboembolism in hospitalized medical patients. Ann Intern Med. 2007;146:278–88. - PubMed
    1. Francis CW. Clinical practice. Prophylaxis for thromboembolism in hospitalized medical patients. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:1438–44. - PubMed
    1. Samama MM, Cohen AT, Darmon JY, Desjardins L, Eldor A, Janbon C, et al. A comparison of enoxaparin with placebo for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in acutely ill medical patients. Prophylaxis in Medical Patients with Enoxaparin Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:793–800. - PubMed