A comprehensive framework for data quality assessment in CER
- PMID: 24303241
- PMCID: PMC3845781
A comprehensive framework for data quality assessment in CER
Abstract
The panel addresses the urgent need to ensure that comparative effectiveness research (CER) findings derived from diverse and distributed data sources are based on credible, high-quality data; and that the methods used to assess and report data quality are consistent, comprehensive, and available to data consumers. The panel consists of representatives from four teams leveraging electronic clinical data for CER, patient centered outcomes research (PCOR), and quality improvement (QI) and seeks to change the current paradigm where data quality assessment (DQA) is performed "behind the scenes" using one-off project specific methods. The panelists will present their process of harmonizing existing models for describing and measuring clinical data quality and will describe a comprehensive integrated framework for assessing and reporting DQA findings. The collaborative project is supported by the Electronic Data Methods (EDM) Forum, a three-year grant from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) to facilitate learning and foster collaboration across a set of CER, PCOR, and QI projects designed to build infrastructure and methods for collecting and analyzing prospective data from electronic clinical data .
Similar articles
-
The Electronic Data Methods (EDM) forum for comparative effectiveness research (CER).Med Care. 2012 Jul;50 Suppl:S7-10. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318257a66b. Med Care. 2012. PMID: 22692262
-
Opportunities and challenges for comparative effectiveness research (CER) with Electronic Clinical Data: a perspective from the EDM forum.Med Care. 2012 Jul;50 Suppl:S11-8. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318258530f. Med Care. 2012. PMID: 22692252
-
eGEMs: Pragmatic Publishing to Build a Learning Health System.EGEMS (Wash DC). 2012 Dec 20;1(1):1001. doi: 10.13063/2327-9214.1001. eCollection 2013. EGEMS (Wash DC). 2012. PMID: 25848553 Free PMC article.
-
Developing Standards for Improving Measurement and Reporting of Data Quality in Health Research [Internet].Washington (DC): Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI); 2018 Mar. Washington (DC): Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI); 2018 Mar. PMID: 37184187 Free Books & Documents. Review.
-
Identifying Priorities for Patient-Centered Outcomes Research for Serious Mental Illness [Internet].Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2011 Sep. Report No.: 11-EHC066-EF. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2011 Sep. Report No.: 11-EHC066-EF. PMID: 22299186 Free Books & Documents. Review.
Cited by
-
A Standard Framework for Evaluating Large Health Care Data and Related Resources.MMWR Suppl. 2024 May 9;73(3):1-13. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.su7303a1. MMWR Suppl. 2024. PMID: 38713639 Free PMC article.
-
Developing a Data Quality Standard Primer for Cardiovascular Risk Assessment from Electronic Health Record Data Using the DataGauge Process.AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2022 Feb 21;2021:388-397. eCollection 2021. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2022. PMID: 35308992 Free PMC article.
-
Synergies between centralized and federated approaches to data quality: a report from the national COVID cohort collaborative.J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 Mar 15;29(4):609-618. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocab217. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022. PMID: 34590684 Free PMC article.
-
Exploring the Hazards of Scaling Up Clinical Data Analyses: A Drug Side Effect Discovery Case Report.AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc. 2021 May 17;2021:180-189. eCollection 2021. AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc. 2021. PMID: 34457132 Free PMC article.
-
Workflow Differences Affect Data Accuracy in Oncologic EHRs: A First Step Toward Detangling the Diagnosis Data Babel.JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2020 Jun;4:529-538. doi: 10.1200/CCI.19.00114. JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2020. PMID: 32543899 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Chan KS , Fowles JB , Weiner JP . Review: Electronic health records and the reliability and validity of quality measures: A review of the literature . Medical Care Research and Review . 2010 ; 67 ( 5 ): 503 – 27 . - PubMed
-
- de Lusignan S , Valentin T , Chan T , Hague N , Wood O , van Vlymen J , et al. Problems with primary care data quality: osteoporosis as an exemplar . Inform Prim Care . 2004 ; 12 ( 3 ): 147 – 56 . - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources