Selection of patients for ambulatory lumbar discectomy: results from four US states
- PMID: 24309619
- DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.11.038
Selection of patients for ambulatory lumbar discectomy: results from four US states
Abstract
Background context: There is a persistent trend for more outpatient lumbar discectomies in the United States.
Purpose: To investigate the characteristics of the patients selected for ambulatory procedures.
Study design: Retrospective cohort study.
Patient sample: Forty-seven thousand one hundred twenty-five patients who underwent outpatient and 102,592 patients undergoing inpatient lumbar discectomies and were were registered in the State Ambulatory Surgery Database (SASD) and State Inpatient Database (SID), respectively, for New York, California, Florida, and North Carolina from 2005 to 2008.
Outcome measures: Rate of outpatient procedures, 30-day readmissions, and hospital charges.
Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study involving patients who underwent outpatient and inpatient lumbar discectomies and were registered in SASD and SID, respectively, for New York, California, Florida, and North Carolina from 2005 to 2008. Logistic regression models were used to demonstrate the association of socioeconomic factors with the odds of undergoing an outpatient procedure.
Results: Male gender (odds ratio [OR], 1.05; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03-1.08), private insurance (OR, 1.93; 95% CI, 1.86-2.01), lower Charlson Comorbidity Index (OR, 4.04; 95% CI, 3.17-5.16), and higher volume hospitals (OR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.04-1.08) were significantly associated with outpatient procedures. Higher income (OR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.81-0.85), older age (OR, 0.996; 95% CI, 0.995-0.997), coverage by Medicaid (OR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.83-0.96), African Americans (OR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.60-0.70), and other minority races were associated with decreased odds of outpatient procedures. The rate of 30-day postoperative readmissions was higher among inpatients. Institutional charges were significantly lower for outpatient lumbar discectomies. The median charge for inpatient surgery was $24,273 as compared with $11,339 for the outpatient setting (p<.0001).
Conclusions: Access to ambulatory lumbar discectomies appears to be more common for younger, white, male patients, with private insurance and less comorbidities, in the setting of higher volume hospitals. Further investigation is needed in the direction of mapping these disparities for appropriate resource utilization.
Keywords: Ambulatory; Lumbar discectomy; Outpatient surgery center; SASD; SID; Socioeconomic disparities.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Institutional charges and disparities in outpatient brain biopsies in four US States: the State Ambulatory Database (SASD).J Neurooncol. 2013 Nov;115(2):277-83. doi: 10.1007/s11060-013-1227-y. J Neurooncol. 2013. PMID: 23959834
-
Spinal cord stimulators: socioeconomic disparities in four US states.Neuromodulation. 2014 Jul;17(5):451-5; discussion 455-6. doi: 10.1111/ner.12101. Epub 2013 Aug 7. Neuromodulation. 2014. PMID: 23924155
-
Socioeconomic characteristics of patients undergoing ambulatory diagnostic cerebral angiography in four US States.Int Angiol. 2014 Feb;33(1):58-64. Int Angiol. 2014. PMID: 24452087
-
Does patient selection account for the perceived cost savings in outpatient spine surgery? A meta-analysis of current evidence and analysis from an administrative database.J Neurosurg Spine. 2018 Dec 1;29(6):687-695. doi: 10.3171/2018.4.SPINE1864. Epub 2018 Sep 14. J Neurosurg Spine. 2018. PMID: 30215589 Review.
-
Outpatient spine surgery: defining the outcomes, value, and barriers to implementation.Neurosurg Focus. 2018 May;44(5):E11. doi: 10.3171/2018.2.FOCUS17790. Neurosurg Focus. 2018. PMID: 29712520 Review.
Cited by
-
The Primary Cost Drivers of Outpatient Distal Radius Fracture Fixation: A Cost-Minimalization Analysis of 15,379 Cases.J Wrist Surg. 2022 Oct 13;12(4):312-317. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1757439. eCollection 2023 Aug. J Wrist Surg. 2022. PMID: 37564613 Free PMC article.
-
Advanced Technologies for Outpatient Lumbar Fusion: Barriers and Opportunities.Int J Spine Surg. 2022 Oct;16(S2):S37-S43. doi: 10.14444/8275. Epub 2022 Jul 13. Int J Spine Surg. 2022. PMID: 35831061 Free PMC article.
-
Readability Analysis of Patient-Accessible Information Regarding Ambulatory Surgical Center Procedures.Int J Spine Surg. 2021 Oct;15(5):1046-1053. doi: 10.14444/8133. Epub 2021 Oct 14. Int J Spine Surg. 2021. PMID: 34649950 Free PMC article.
-
Outpatient Versus Inpatient Anterior Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Multisite, Comparative Analysis of Patient Safety Measures.Int J Spine Surg. 2021 Oct;15(5):937-944. doi: 10.14444/8123. Epub 2021 Sep 22. Int J Spine Surg. 2021. PMID: 34551930 Free PMC article.
-
Cost Comparison of Open and Arthroscopic Treatment Options for SLAP Tears.Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2021 Jan 30;3(2):e315-e322. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2020.09.020. eCollection 2021 Apr. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2021. PMID: 34027437 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
