A comparison of outcomes from in vitro fertilization cycles stimulated with either recombinant luteinizing hormone (LH) or human chorionic gonadotropin acting as an LH analogue delivered as human menopausal gonadotropins, in subjects with good or poor ovarian reserve: a retrospective analysis

Abstract

Objectives: To compare rates of pregnancy and IVF parameters in subjects who were stimulated with FSH plus recombinant human luteinizing hormone or menopausal gonadotropins. To determine whether responses to type of LH differ in poor or good responders.

Study design: Retrospective analysis at a university-based fertility center. Subjects were women with good and poor ovarian reserve, who underwent in vitro fertilization during a 2 year period, as part of a long agonist (N=122), or microdose flair (N=79) protocol. Measurements included FSH and LH dose, number of oocytes collected, number of embryos obtained, and pregnancy and clinical pregnancy rates.

Results: Patients treated with r-hLH (n=105) had higher numbers of eggs retrieved and of embryos while using less FSH than their hMG-treated (n=96) counterparts. Pregnancy and clinical pregnancy rates were significantly higher with r-hLH than with hMG protocols (p=0.008 and 0.009, respectively). If patients had a baseline serum FSH level ≥10IU/L, clinical pregnancy rates were higher when r-hLH was used. When the antral follicle count was below 6 no significant differences in stimulation parameters or outcomes were detected between the groups.

Conclusion: r-hLH may be beneficial when compared to hMG and used for in-vitro fertilization, except in subjects with baseline follicle counts less than 6. Further data should be obtained.

Keywords: Human menopausal gonadotropins; IVF outcomes; Ovarian stimulation; Recombinant luteinizing hormone.