National trends in utilization and outcomes of angioplasty and stenting for revascularization in intracranial stenosis
- PMID: 24314879
- DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2013.10.022
National trends in utilization and outcomes of angioplasty and stenting for revascularization in intracranial stenosis
Abstract
Introduction: Angioplasty and intracranial stenting (ICS) are both endovascular revascularization procedures that have emerged as treatment options for intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD). Some believe angioplasty alone is better, while others believe stenting is better. This study examines recent trends in utilization and outcomes of angioplasty alone and ICS in the United States using a population-based cohort.
Methods: The National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database was queried for patients with ICAD who underwent angioplasty or ICS from 2005 to 2010.
Results: There were 1115 patients (angioplasty: n=495, ICS: n=620) with ICAD who underwent endovascular revascularization. Over time, the number of endovascular revascularization procedures increased. The percentage of symptomatic patients (p=0.015) as well as in the number of comorbidities of patients treated (p<0.001) also increased. Combined post-procedure stroke and death rates were 16% and 28.9% for angioplasty and ICS, respectively (p<0.001). A larger percentage of angioplasty patients presented symptomatically compared to those who underwent ICS (p<0.001).
Conclusion: Angioplasty appears to be associated with higher rates of peri-procedural complications; however, that may represent patient selection bias. Further studies are needed to identify patients who would benefit from revascularization and to clarify the roles of angioplasty and ICS.
Keywords: Angioplasty; ICAD; ICS; Intracranial atherosclerosis disease; Intracranial stenosis; Intracranial stenting; National Inpatient Sample database; intracranial atherosclerotic disease; intracranial stenting.
Published by Elsevier B.V.
Comment in
-
Effect of SAMMPRIS on endovascular interventions for intracranial atherosclerosis.Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2014 May;120:145. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2014.02.027. Epub 2014 Mar 12. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2014. PMID: 24680398 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Revisiting angioplasty without stenting for symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis after the stenting and aggressive medical management for preventing recurrent stroke in intracranial stenosis (SAMMPRIS) study.Neurosurgery. 2012 Dec;71(6):1103-10. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e318271bcb8. Neurosurgery. 2012. PMID: 22986593
-
Submaximal angioplasty for symptomatic intracranial atherosclerosis: a prospective Phase I study.J Neurosurg. 2016 Oct;125(4):964-971. doi: 10.3171/2015.8.JNS15791. Epub 2016 Jan 8. J Neurosurg. 2016. PMID: 26745485 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of outcomes and utilization of extracranial-intracranial bypass versus intracranial stenting for intracranial stenosis.Surg Neurol Int. 2014 Dec 11;5:178. doi: 10.4103/2152-7806.146831. eCollection 2014. Surg Neurol Int. 2014. PMID: 25593762 Free PMC article.
-
Treatment of intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis.Rev Neurol Dis. 2008 Summer;5(3):117-24. Rev Neurol Dis. 2008. PMID: 18838951 Review.
-
Stent-assisted endoluminal revascularization for the treatment of intracranial atherosclerotic disease.Neurol Res. 2002 Jun;24(4):337-46. doi: 10.1179/016164102101200113. Neurol Res. 2002. PMID: 12069279 Review.
Cited by
-
Stenting in Intracranial Stenosis: Current Controversies and Future Directions.Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2015 Aug;17(8):48. doi: 10.1007/s11883-015-0527-4. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2015. PMID: 26104430 Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
