Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014 Mar;35(1):37-55.
doi: 10.1007/s10912-013-9267-z.

It Is as It Does: Genital Form and Function in Sex Reassignment Surgery

Affiliations
Review

It Is as It Does: Genital Form and Function in Sex Reassignment Surgery

Eric D Plemons. J Med Humanit. .

Abstract

Surgeons who perform sex reassignment surgeries (SRS) define their goals and evaluate their outcomes in terms of two kinds of results: aesthetic and functional. Since the neogenitals fashioned through sex reassignment surgeries do not enable reproductive function, surgeons must determine what the function of the genitals is or ought to be. A review of surgical literature demonstrates that questions of what constitute genital form and function, while putatively answered in the operating room, are not answerable in the discourses of clinical evaluation used to define them. When the genitals--the word itself derived from the Latin genitas meaning to beget--are not reproductive, the question of their function shifts away from the biological and into other registers: pleasure, intimacy, sociality. As condensed sites of meaning and meaning-making around which selves, affects, resources, anxieties and futures are organized, the genitals signify in excess of the categories of "aesthetic" and "function" that surgeons use to assess them. Not reducible to either aesthetics or function, but constitutive of them both, this excess appears in surgical texts in the form of imagined futures of social and sexual engagement and demonstrates a powerful means by which properly sexed bodies are created.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009 Aug;124(2):510-8 - PubMed
    1. J Sex Med. 2007 Jul;4(4 Pt 1):981-9 - PubMed
    1. BJU Int. 2008 May;101(10):1297-300 - PubMed
    1. Ann Plast Surg. 1993 Apr;30(4):323-6 - PubMed
    1. Br J Plast Surg. 1999 Apr;52(3):217-22 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources

Feedback