Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
, 61 (51), 12473-91

Systemic Acquired Resistance (50 Years After Discovery): Moving From the Lab to the Field

Affiliations
Review

Systemic Acquired Resistance (50 Years After Discovery): Moving From the Lab to the Field

Franco Gozzo et al. J Agric Food Chem.

Abstract

Induction of plant defense(s) against pathogen challenge(s) has been the object of progressively more intense research in the past two decades. Insights on mechanisms of systemic acquired resistance (SAR) and similar, alternative processes, as well as on problems encountered on moving to their practical application in open field, have been carefully pursued and, as far as possible, defined. In reviewing the number of research works published in metabolomic, genetic, biochemical, and crop protection correlated disciplines, the following outline has been adopted: 1, introduction to the processes currently considered as models of the innate immunity; 2, primary signals, such as salicylic acid (SA), jasmonic acid (JA), and abscisic acid (ABA), involved with different roles in the above-mentioned processes; 3, long-distance signals, identified from petiole exudates as mobile signaling metabolites during expressed resistance; 4, exogenous inducers, including the most significant chemicals known to stimulate the plant resistance induction and originated from both synthetic and natural sources; 5, fungicides shown to act as stimulators of SAR in addition to their biocidal action; 6, elusive mechanism of priming, reporting on the most recent working hypotheses on the pretranscriptional ways through which treated plants may express resistance upon pathogen attack and how this resistance can be transmitted to the next generation; 7, fitness costs and benefits of SAR so far reported from field application of induced resistance; 8, factors affecting efficacy of induced resistance in the open field, indicating that forces, unrevealed under controlled conditions, may be operative in the field; 9, concluding remarks address the efforts required to apply the strategy of crop resistance induction according to the rules of integrated pest management.

Similar articles

  • Systemic Acquired Resistance in Crop Protection: From Nature to a Chemical Approach
    F Gozzo. J Agric Food Chem 51 (16), 4487-503. PMID 14705870. - Review
    Plant natural resistance to potential parasites is regulated by two fundamental mechanisms: the "nonhost" and the "gene-for-gene" resistance, respectively. The latter is …
  • Plant Immunization
    IL Kothari et al. Indian J Exp Biol 42 (3), 244-52. PMID 15233292. - Review
    Plant immunization is the process of activating natural defense system present in plant induced by biotic or abiotic factors. Plants are pre-treated with inducing agents …
  • Systemic Signaling During Plant Defense
    A Kachroo et al. Curr Opin Plant Biol 16 (4), 527-33. PMID 23870750. - Review
    Systemic acquired resistance (SAR) is a type of pathogen-induced broad-spectrum resistance in plants. During SAR, primary infection-induced rapid generation and transport …
  • Systemic Acquired Resistance: The Elusive Signal(s)
    AC Vlot et al. Curr Opin Plant Biol 11 (4), 436-42. PMID 18614393. - Review
    Systemic acquired resistance (SAR) is a form of inducible resistance that is triggered in systemic healthy tissues of locally infected plants. The nature of the mobile si …
  • SOS - Too Many Signals for Systemic Acquired Resistance?
    DA Dempsey et al. Trends Plant Sci 17 (9), 538-45. PMID 22749315. - Review
    Following pathogen infection, activation of systemic acquired resistance (SAR) in uninfected tissues requires transmission of a signal(s) from the infected tissue via the …
See all similar articles

Cited by 23 PubMed Central articles

See all "Cited by" articles

LinkOut - more resources

Feedback