The impact of recent screening recommendations on prostate cancer screening in a large health care system
- PMID: 24342148
- DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.12.010
The impact of recent screening recommendations on prostate cancer screening in a large health care system
Abstract
Purpose: The United States Preventive Services Task Force recently recommended against routine prostate cancer screening, stating that the risks of screening outweigh the benefits. We determined the impact of this recommendation on prostate cancer screening in a large health system.
Materials and methods: We obtained data on all screening prostate specific antigen tests performed at University Hospitals Case Medical Center and affiliated hospitals in northeastern Ohio from January 2008 to December 2012. We examined the total number of prostate specific antigen tests ordered with time and adjusted for patient volume by fitting a regression line. The overall trend was examined and stratified by location (urban, suburban or rural), patient age and provider type (primary care or urology).
Results: A total of 43,498 screening prostate specific antigen tests were performed from January 2008 to December 2012. Most tests were ordered by specialists in internal medicine (64.9%), followed by family medicine (23.7%), urology (6.1%) and hematology/oncology (1.3%). Prostate specific antigen screening increased with time until March 2009, when initial screening trials were published. Prostate specific antigen testing then decreased significantly and continued to decrease after the task force recommendations. Similar patterns were noted in almost all subgroups. The greatest decrease in screening was observed by urologists and in patients in the intermediate age group (50 to 59 years).
Conclusions: United States Preventive Services Task Force recommendations appeared to have decreased prostate cancer screening. The greatest impact was seen for urologists and patients in the intermediate age group. Further study is needed to determine the long-term effects of these recommendations on the screening, diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of this prevalent malignancy.
Keywords: mass screening; practice guidelines as topic; prostate; prostate-specific antigen; prostatic neoplasms.
Copyright © 2014 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Prostate cancer screening and risk of litigation: caught between Scylla and Charybdis.J Urol. 2014 Jun;191(6):1648-9. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.03.085. Epub 2014 Mar 18. J Urol. 2014. PMID: 24656674 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Impact of the 2012 United States Preventive Services Task Force statement on prostate-specific antigen screening: analysis of urologic and primary care practices.Urology. 2015 Jan;85(1):85-9. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.07.072. Epub 2014 Nov 11. Urology. 2015. PMID: 25440819
-
Testing and referral patterns in the years surrounding the US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation against prostate-specific antigen screening.Cancer. 2016 Dec 15;122(24):3785-3793. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30330. Epub 2016 Sep 22. Cancer. 2016. PMID: 27658175
-
Primary care physician PSA screening practices before and after the final U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation.Urol Oncol. 2014 Jan;32(1):41.e23-30. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2013.04.013. Epub 2013 Aug 2. Urol Oncol. 2014. PMID: 23911680
-
Screening for prostate cancer: the current evidence and guidelines controversy.Can J Urol. 2011 Oct;18(5):5875-83. Can J Urol. 2011. PMID: 22018148 Review.
-
Prostate-specific antigen tests and prostate cancer screening: an update for primary care physicians.Can J Urol. 2010 Feb;17 Suppl 1:18-25. Can J Urol. 2010. PMID: 20170597 Review.
Cited by
-
Association of Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening Rates With Subsequent Metastatic Prostate Cancer Incidence at US Veterans Health Administration Facilities.JAMA Oncol. 2022 Dec 1;8(12):1747-1755. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.4319. JAMA Oncol. 2022. PMID: 36279204 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical utility of a serum biomarker panel in distinguishing prostate cancer from benign prostate hyperplasia.Sci Rep. 2021 Jul 23;11(1):15052. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-94438-4. Sci Rep. 2021. PMID: 34302010 Free PMC article.
-
Use of the prostate-specific antigen test in the U.S. for men age 30 to 64 in 2011 to 2017 using a large commercial claims database: Implications for practice interventions.Cancer Rep (Hoboken). 2021 Aug;4(4):e1365. doi: 10.1002/cnr2.1365. Epub 2021 May 2. Cancer Rep (Hoboken). 2021. PMID: 33934557 Free PMC article.
-
Use of the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test in the United States for men age ≥65, 1999-2015: Implications for practice interventions.Cancer Rep (Hoboken). 2021 Aug;4(4):e1352. doi: 10.1002/cnr2.1352. Epub 2021 May 1. Cancer Rep (Hoboken). 2021. PMID: 33932150 Free PMC article.
-
Impact on prostate cancer clinical presentation after non-screening policies at a tertiary-care medical center- a retrospective study.BMC Urol. 2021 Feb 8;21(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s12894-021-00784-w. BMC Urol. 2021. PMID: 33557801 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
