Risk factors for revision within 10 years of total knee arthroplasty
- PMID: 24347046
- PMCID: PMC3940740
- DOI: 10.1007/s11999-013-3416-6
Risk factors for revision within 10 years of total knee arthroplasty
Abstract
Background: An in-depth understanding of risk factors for revision TKA is needed to minimize the burden of revision surgery. Previous studies indicate that hospital and community characteristics may influence outcomes after TKA, but a detailed investigation in a diverse population is warranted to identify opportunities for quality improvement.
Questions/purposes: We asked: (1) What is the frequency of revision TKA within 10 years of primary arthroplasty? (2) Which patient demographic factors are associated with revision within 10 years of TKA? (3) Which community and institutional characteristics are associated with revision within 10 years of TKA?
Methods: We identified 301,955 patients who underwent primary TKAs in New York or California from 1997 to 2005 from statewide databases. Identifier codes were used to determine whether they underwent revision TKA. Patient, community, and hospital characteristics were analyzed using multivariable regression modeling to determine predictors for revision.
Results: The frequency of revision was 4.0% at 5 years after the index arthroplasty and 8.9% at 9-years. Patients between 50 and 75 years old had a lower risk of revision than patients younger than 50 years (hazard ratio [HR], 0.47; 95% CI, 0.44, 0.50). Black patients were at increased risk for needing revision surgery (HR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.29, 1.49) after adjustment for insurance type, poverty level, and education. Women (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.79, 0.86) and Medicare recipients (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.79, 0.86) were less likely to undergo revision surgery, whereas those from the most educated (HR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.02, 1.16) and the poorest communities (HR, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.01, 1.15) had modest increases in risk of revision. Mid-volume hospitals (200-400 annual cases) had a reduction of early revision (HR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.83, 0.99) compared with those performing less than 200 cases annually, whereas higher-volume hospitals (greater than 400 cases) showed little effect compared with low-volume hospitals.
Conclusions: Patient, community, and institutional characteristics affect the risk for revision within 10 years of index TKA. These data can be used to develop process improvement and implant surveillance strategies among high-risk patients.
Level of evidence: Level III, therapeutic study. See the Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Figures
Comment in
-
CORR Insights(®): Risk factors for revision within 10 years of total knee arthroplasty.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Apr;472(4):1208-9. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-3450-4. Epub 2014 Feb 14. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014. PMID: 24526297 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Are TKAs Performed in High-volume Hospitals Less Likely to Undergo Revision Than TKAs Performed in Low-volume Hospitals?Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Nov;475(11):2669-2674. doi: 10.1007/s11999-017-5463-x. Epub 2017 Aug 11. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017. PMID: 28801816 Free PMC article.
-
Sex and surgical outcomes and mortality after primary total knee arthroplasty: a risk-adjusted analysis.Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2013 Jul;65(7):1095-102. doi: 10.1002/acr.21953. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2013. PMID: 23335560 Free PMC article.
-
Are revisions of patellofemoral arthroplasties more like primary or revision TKAs.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Jan;473(1):213-9. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3756-x. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015. PMID: 24980643 Free PMC article.
-
Factors associated with hospital stay length, discharge destination, and 30-day readmission rate after primary hip or knee arthroplasty: Retrospective Cohort Study.Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2019 Sep;105(5):949-955. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2019.04.012. Epub 2019 Jun 15. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2019. PMID: 31208932 Review.
-
Knee instability as the primary cause of failure following Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA): A systematic review on the patient, surgical and implant characteristics of revised TKA patients.Knee. 2017 Dec;24(6):1271-1281. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2017.08.060. Epub 2017 Sep 29. Knee. 2017. PMID: 28970123 Review.
Cited by
-
Temporal Trends in the Rate of Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty for Prosthetic Joint Infection.Arthroplast Today. 2024 Jul 3;28:101442. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2024.101442. eCollection 2024 Aug. Arthroplast Today. 2024. PMID: 39071089 Free PMC article.
-
Over a decade of experience in total knee arthroplasty with a multiradius design and fixed bearing at a single centre: Data from the Catalan Arthroplasty Registry.J Exp Orthop. 2024 Jul 2;11(3):e12076. doi: 10.1002/jeo2.12076. eCollection 2024 Jul. J Exp Orthop. 2024. PMID: 38957226 Free PMC article.
-
Neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantages associated with increased rates of revisions, readmissions, and complications after total joint arthroplasty.Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2024 Jul;34(5):2331-2338. doi: 10.1007/s00590-024-03913-x. Epub 2024 Apr 6. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2024. PMID: 38581454
-
The Utility of the Area Deprivation Index in Assessing Complications After Total Joint Arthroplasty.JB JS Open Access. 2024 Apr 4;9(2):e23.00115. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.23.00115. eCollection 2024 Apr-Jun. JB JS Open Access. 2024. PMID: 38577548 Free PMC article.
-
Does interaction occur between risk factors for revision total knee arthroplasty?Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Oct 30. doi: 10.1007/s00402-023-05107-2. Online ahead of print. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023. PMID: 37902892
References
-
- Bang H, Chiu YL, Memtsoudis SG, Mandl LA, Della Valle AG, Mushlin AI, Marx RG, Mazumdar M. Total hip and total knee arthroplasties: trends and disparities revisited. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2010;39:E95–E102. - PubMed
-
- Bozic KJ, Kinder J, Meneghini RM, Zurakowski D, Rosenberg AG, Galante JO. Implant survivorship and complication rates after total knee arthroplasty with a third-generation cemented system: 5 to 8 years followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;430:117–124. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000146539.23869.14. - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
