Comparative effectiveness of skin antiseptic agents in reducing surgical site infections: a report from the Washington State Surgical Care and Outcomes Assessment Program
- PMID: 24364925
- PMCID: PMC4636188
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.11.018
Comparative effectiveness of skin antiseptic agents in reducing surgical site infections: a report from the Washington State Surgical Care and Outcomes Assessment Program
Abstract
Background: Surgical site infections (SSI) are an important source of morbidity and mortality. Chlorhexidine in isopropyl alcohol is effective in preventing central venous-catheter associated infections, but its effectiveness in reducing SSI in clean-contaminated procedures is uncertain. Surgical studies to date have had contradictory results. We aimed to further evaluate the relationship of commonly used antiseptic agents and SSI, and to determine if isopropyl alcohol has a unique effect.
Study design: We performed a prospective cohort analysis to evaluate the relationship of commonly used skin antiseptic agents and SSI for patients undergoing mostly clean-contaminated surgery from January 2011 through June 2012. Multivariate regression modeling predicted expected rates of SSI. Risk adjusted event rates (RAERs) of SSI were compared across groups using proportionality testing.
Results: Among 7,669 patients, the rate of SSI was 4.6%. The RAERs were 0.85 (p = 0.28) for chlorhexidine (CHG), 1.10 (p = 0.06) for chlorhexidine in isopropyl alcohol (CHG+IPA), 0.98 (p = 0.96) for povidone-iodine (PVI), and 0.93 (p = 0.51) for iodine-povacrylex in isopropyl alcohol (IPC+IPA). The RAERs were 0.91 (p = 0.39) for the non-IPA group and 1.10 (p = 0.07) for the IPA group. Among elective colorectal patients, the RAERs were 0.90 (p = 0.48) for CHG, 1.04 (p = 0.67) for CHG+IPA, 1.04 (p = 0.85) for PVI, and 1.00 (p = 0.99) for IPC+IPA.
Conclusions: For clean-contaminated surgical cases, this large-scale state cohort study did not demonstrate superiority of any commonly used skin antiseptic agent in reducing the risk of SSI, nor did it find any unique effect of isopropyl alcohol. These results do not support the use of more expensive skin preparation agents.
Copyright © 2014 American College of Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
None of the authors have any financial or personal conflicts of interests pertaining to this work.
Comment in
-
Re: Comparative effectiveness of skin antiseptic agents in reducing surgical site infections: a report from the Washington State Surgical Care and Outcomes Assessment Program.J Urol. 2014 Aug;192(2):431. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.05.066. Epub 2014 May 14. J Urol. 2014. PMID: 25034999 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Reducing Mediastinitis after Sternotomy with Combined Chlorhexidine-Isopropyl Alcohol Skin Disinfection: Analysis of 3,000 Patients.Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2016 Oct;17(5):552-6. doi: 10.1089/sur.2015.140. Epub 2016 Jun 9. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2016. PMID: 27281495
-
Does chlorhexidine and povidone-iodine preoperative antisepsis reduce surgical site infection in cranial neurosurgery?Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2016 Jul;98(6):405-8. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2016.0143. Epub 2016 Apr 8. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2016. PMID: 27055411 Free PMC article.
-
Preoperative skin antisepsis with chlorhexidine gluconate versus povidone-iodine: a prospective analysis of 6959 consecutive spinal surgery patients.J Neurosurg Spine. 2018 Feb;28(2):209-214. doi: 10.3171/2017.5.SPINE17158. Epub 2017 Nov 24. J Neurosurg Spine. 2018. PMID: 29171793
-
Preoperative skin antiseptics for preventing surgical wound infections after clean surgery.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Mar 28;(3):CD003949. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003949.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Apr 21;(4):CD003949. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003949.pub4. PMID: 23543526 Updated. Review.
-
Preoperative skin antiseptics for preventing surgical wound infections after clean surgery.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Apr 21;2015(4):CD003949. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003949.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015. PMID: 25897764 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Antiseptic efficacy of an innovative perioperative surgical skin preparation: A confirmatory FDA phase 3 analysis.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2020 Jun;41(6):653-659. doi: 10.1017/ice.2020.27. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2020. PMID: 32131912 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Preoperative Antisepsis with Chlorhexidine Versus Povidone-Iodine for the Prevention of Surgical Site Infection: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.World J Surg. 2020 May;44(5):1412-1424. doi: 10.1007/s00268-020-05384-7. World J Surg. 2020. PMID: 31996985
-
Optimal Timing of Preoperative Skin Preparation with Povidone-Iodine for Spine Surgery: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Study.Asian Spine J. 2015 Jun;9(3):423-6. doi: 10.4184/asj.2015.9.3.423. Epub 2015 Jun 8. Asian Spine J. 2015. PMID: 26097658 Free PMC article.
References
-
- National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System. Semi-Annual Report. Atlanta, GA: 1996.
-
- Kirkland KB, Briggs JP, Trivette SL, et al. The impact of surgical-site infections in the 1990s: Attributable mortality, excess length of hospitalization, and extra costs. Infect Control Hospital Epidemiol. 1999;20:725–730. - PubMed
-
- O’Grady NP, Alexander M, Burns La, et al. Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. Am J Infect Control. 2011;39:S1–34. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
