Overview of the CDC Cervical Cancer (Cx3) Study: an educational intervention of HPV testing for cervical cancer screening
- PMID: 24380501
- PMCID: PMC4386595
- DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2013.4655
Overview of the CDC Cervical Cancer (Cx3) Study: an educational intervention of HPV testing for cervical cancer screening
Abstract
Background: The recommended screening interval when using the Papanicolaou (Pap) and human papillomavirus (HPV) test (co-testing) is 5 years. However because providers are reluctant to extend the screening interval, we launched a study to identify barriers to appropriate use of the co-test and to implement an educational intervention to promote evidence-based screening practices. This article provides an overview of the study including the multi-component intervention and participant demographics.
Methods: The study was conducted in 15 clinics associated with 6 Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) in Illinois. Each clinic received HPV tests to administer with routine Pap tests among enrolled patients (n=2,246) and was assigned to a study arm: intervention arm (n=7) received a multi-component educational intervention (small media, academic detailing, and website) for providers and printed educational materials for patients, and control arm (n=8) received printed copies of general guidelines. Clinic coordinators (n=15), providers (n=98), and patients (n=984) completed baseline surveys to assess screening practices.
Results: Providers reported an average age of 41.3 years and were predominately female, non-Hispanic, and white. Patients reported an average age of 45.0 years and nearly two-thirds were Hispanic or black. Of the 2,246 patients, 89% had a normal co-test. Lessons learned from the study included the importance of buy-in at a high level in the organization, a champion provider, and a clinical coordinator devoted to the study.
Conclusion: Materials from this study can be adapted to educate providers and patients on appropriate use of the co-test and encourage extended screening intervals as a safe and effective practice.
Similar articles
-
Change in Provider Beliefs Regarding Cervical Cancer Screening Intervals After an Educational Intervention.J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2016 May;25(5):422-7. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2015.5706. Epub 2016 Apr 20. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2016. PMID: 27096534
-
Primary care provider practices and beliefs related to cervical cancer screening with the HPV test in Federally Qualified Health Centers.Prev Med. 2013 Nov;57(5):419-25. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.04.012. Epub 2013 Apr 28. Prev Med. 2013. PMID: 23628517 Free PMC article.
-
Primary care providers human papillomavirus vaccine recommendations for the medically underserved: a pilot study in U.S. Federally Qualified Health Centers.Vaccine. 2014 Sep 22;32(42):5432-5. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.07.098. Epub 2014 Aug 12. Vaccine. 2014. PMID: 25131744 Free PMC article.
-
Cervical cancer screening with both human papillomavirus and Papanicolaou testing vs Papanicolaou testing alone: what screening intervals are physicians recommending?Arch Intern Med. 2010 Jun 14;170(11):977-85. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.134. Arch Intern Med. 2010. PMID: 20548011
-
Are Health Care Professionals Prepared to Implement Human Papillomavirus Testing? A Review of Psychosocial Determinants of Human Papillomavirus Test Acceptability in Primary Cervical Cancer Screening.J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2020 Mar;29(3):390-405. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2019.7678. Epub 2019 Sep 3. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2020. PMID: 31479381 Review.
Cited by
-
Multimodal MRI Analysis of Cervical Cancer on the Basis of Artificial Intelligence Algorithm.Contrast Media Mol Imaging. 2021 Nov 8;2021:1673490. doi: 10.1155/2021/1673490. eCollection 2021. Contrast Media Mol Imaging. 2021. PMID: 34858113 Free PMC article.
-
Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 6;9(9):CD002834. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002834.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021. PMID: 34694000 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Learning From Cervical Cancer Survivors: An Examination of Barriers and Facilitators to Cervical Cancer Screening Among Women in the United States.J Prim Care Community Health. 2021 Jan-Dec;12:21501327211041862. doi: 10.1177/21501327211041862. J Prim Care Community Health. 2021. PMID: 34486436 Free PMC article.
-
Overview of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Case Investigation of Cervical Cancer Study.J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2019 Jul;28(7):890-896. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2019.7849. Epub 2019 Jul 2. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2019. PMID: 31264934 Free PMC article.
-
Changes in Knowledge and Beliefs About Human Papillomavirus and Cervical Cancer Screening Intervals in Low-Income Women After an Educational Intervention.J Prim Care Community Health. 2016 Apr;7(2):88-95. doi: 10.1177/2150131915624869. Epub 2016 Jan 13. J Prim Care Community Health. 2016. PMID: 26763304 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Committee on Practice Bulletins—Gynecology ACOG practice bulletin number 109: Cervical cytology screening. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114:1409–1420. - PubMed
-
- National Research Council . Clinical preventive services for women: Closing the gaps. The National Academies Press; Washington, DC: 2011.
-
- Moyer VA. Screening for cervical cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2012;156:880–891. - PubMed
-
- Bistoletti P, Sennfalt K, Dillner J. Cost-effectiveness of primary cytology and HPV DNA cervical screening. Int J Cancer. 2008;122:372–376. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
