Critical thinking in health professions education: summary and consensus statements of the Millennium Conference 2011
- PMID: 24405353
- DOI: 10.1080/10401334.2013.857335
Critical thinking in health professions education: summary and consensus statements of the Millennium Conference 2011
Abstract
Purpose: Critical thinking is central to the function of health care professionals. However, this topic is not explicitly taught or assessed within current programs, yet the need is greater than ever, in an era of information explosion, spiraling health care costs, and increased understanding about metacognition. To address the importance of teaching critical thinking in health professions education, the Shapiro Institute for Education and Research and the Josiah Macy Jr. Foundation jointly sponsored the Millennium Conference 2011 on Critical Thinking.
Summary: Teams of physician and nurse educators were selected through an application process. Attendees proposed strategies for integrating principles of critical thinking more explicitly into health professions curricula. Working in interprofessional, multi-institutional groups, participants tackled questions about teaching, assessment, and faculty development. Deliberations were summarized into consensus statements.
Conclusions: Educational leaders participated in a structured dialogue about the enhancement of critical thinking in health professions education and recommend strategies to teach critical thinking.
Similar articles
-
A qualitative review of the design thinking framework in health professions education.BMC Med Educ. 2019 Apr 4;19(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1528-8. BMC Med Educ. 2019. PMID: 30947748 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Systems Thinking and Systems-Based Practice Across the Health Professions: An Inquiry Into Definitions, Teaching Practices, and Assessment.Teach Learn Med. 2018 Jul-Sep;30(3):242-254. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2017.1398654. Epub 2017 Dec 28. Teach Learn Med. 2018. PMID: 29283669
-
A multi-site study of strategies to teach critical thinking: 'why do you think that?'.Med Educ. 2016 Feb;50(2):236-49. doi: 10.1111/medu.12937. Med Educ. 2016. PMID: 26813002
-
A design thinking approach to evaluating interprofessional education.J Interprof Care. 2016 May;30(3):378-80. doi: 10.3109/13561820.2015.1122582. Epub 2016 Mar 30. J Interprof Care. 2016. PMID: 27030030
-
Criteria for social media-based scholarship in health professions education.Postgrad Med J. 2015 Oct;91(1080):551-5. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2015-133300. Epub 2015 Aug 14. Postgrad Med J. 2015. PMID: 26275426 Review.
Cited by
-
Construction and Psychometric Evaluation of the Critical Thinking Disposition Assessment Questionnaire Among Medical Undergraduate Students in West Bengal, India.Cureus. 2024 Sep 26;16(9):e70266. doi: 10.7759/cureus.70266. eCollection 2024 Sep. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 39463669 Free PMC article.
-
Factors that hinder critical thinking and their resolution: Is active learning the key?Pak J Med Sci. 2024 Jul;40(6):1313-1314. doi: 10.12669/pjms.40.6.9490. Pak J Med Sci. 2024. PMID: 38952521 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Exploring tutor perceptions and current practices in facilitating diagnostic reasoning in preclinical medical students: Implications for tutor professional development needs.MedEdPublish (2016). 2018 May 22;7:106. doi: 10.15694/mep.2018.0000106.1. eCollection 2018. MedEdPublish (2016). 2018. PMID: 38074568 Free PMC article.
-
COVID-19 and Health Professions Education: A 360° View of the Impact of a Global Health Emergency.MedEdPublish (2016). 2020 Jul 17;9:148. doi: 10.15694/mep.2020.000148.1. eCollection 2020. MedEdPublish (2016). 2020. PMID: 38073832 Free PMC article.
-
Tool to assess recognition and understanding of elements in Summary of Findings Table for health evidence synthesis: a cross-sectional study.Sci Rep. 2023 Oct 23;13(1):18044. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-45359-x. Sci Rep. 2023. PMID: 37872203 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources