Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2014 Feb;17(2):201-3.
doi: 10.1038/nn.3623. Epub 2014 Jan 12.

Post-study caffeine administration enhances memory consolidation in humans

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Post-study caffeine administration enhances memory consolidation in humans

Daniel Borota et al. Nat Neurosci. 2014 Feb.

Abstract

It is currently not known whether caffeine has an enhancing effect on long-term memory in humans. We used post-study caffeine administration to test its effect on memory consolidation using a behavioral discrimination task. Caffeine enhanced performance 24 h after administration according to an inverted U-shaped dose-response curve; this effect was specific to consolidation and not retrieval. We conclude that caffeine enhanced consolidation of long-term memories in humans.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

COMPETING FINANCIAL INTERESTS

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Caffeine enhances discrimination performance 24 h after study. (a) Outline of study design. After arrival of screened subjects, a baseline salivary sample was collected. Then the encoding task was administered. This was an incidental indoor-outdoor judgment task (stimuli every 2,500 ms, with an interstimulus interval (ISI) of 500 ms). After encoding, subjects were administered either 200 mg caffeine or placebo pills. After 1 h and 3 h, additional saliva samples were collected. Subjects returned 24 h later for testing. Before a recognition test, a final saliva sample was collected. Recognition was tested using an old-similar-new judgment task (stimuli every 2,500 ms with a 500-ms ISI) using targets, foils and similar lures that are particularly sensitive to hippocampal pattern separation. (b) Lure discrimination by subjects (i.e., whether subjects had a higher propensity to call lure items ‘similar’ rather than ‘old’) (t42 = 1.79, one-tailed P = 0.04). *P < 0.05, one-tailed. (c,d) Target hit rates (c) and foil rejection rates (d) (t42 = 0.59, one-tailed P = 0.27 and t42 = 0.15, one-tailed P = 0.44 between groups that received caffeine and placebo, for data in c and d, respectively). Error bars, ±s.e.m.; n = 20 subjects (caffeine) and n = 24 subjects (placebo).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Impact of caffeine on consolidation and variable dose effects. (a) LDI in subjects administered placebo or caffeine immediately after the study session (immediate), or caffeine 24 h after the study session (delayed). LDI in immediate caffeine group was enhanced compared to placebo (t71 = 2.0, two-tailed P = 0.049). LDI in the delayed group was no different from placebo (t55 = 0.63, P = 0.53). (b) Analysis by item similarity showed a significant main effect of similarity (F2,88 = 12.87, P = 0.001) as well as a main effect of caffeine (F1,42 = 4.07, P = 0.05). (c) Discrimination as a function of indicated caffeine dose (200 mg caffeine compared to placebo, t71 = 2.0, two-tailed P = 0.049 and compared to 100 mg caffeine, t48 = 2.19, two-tailed P = 0.033). Discrimination at 200 mg and 300 mg caffeine doses compared to placebo and 100 mg caffeine combined, t96 = 2.77, two-tailed P = 0.007. (d) Rebinned subject performance based on change in the amount of caffeine from baseline divided into quartiles (no change, low change, medium change and high change) showing evidence for an inverted U-shaped dose-response curve. The quadratic curve fit (R2 = 0.81) was significantly better than the linear fit (R2 = 0.45) for discrimination as a function of caffeine change (F = 29.5, P = 0.001). Error bars, ±s.e.m.*P < 0.05.

Comment in

  • Stimulating memory consolidation.
    Favila SE, Kuhl BA. Favila SE, et al. Nat Neurosci. 2014 Feb;17(2):151-2. doi: 10.1038/nn.3638. Nat Neurosci. 2014. PMID: 24473261 No abstract available.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Nehlig A. J. Alzheimers Dis. 2010;20(suppl. 1):S85–S94. - PubMed
    1. McGaugh JL. Science. 2000;287:248–251. - PubMed
    1. Yassa MA, Stark CEL. Trends Neurosci. 2011;34:515–525. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yassa MA, et al. Hippocampus. 2011;21:968–979. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cunha RA, Agostinho PM. J. Alzheimers Dis. 2010;20(suppl. 1):S95–S116. - PubMed

Publication types