Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Mar;18(3):532-41.
doi: 10.1007/s11605-014-2454-z. Epub 2014 Jan 16.

Regionalization and outcomes of hepato-pancreato-biliary cancer surgery in USA

Affiliations

Regionalization and outcomes of hepato-pancreato-biliary cancer surgery in USA

Paul D Colavita et al. J Gastrointest Surg. 2014 Mar.

Abstract

Background: Recent publications demonstrate regionalization of complex operations to high-volume centers (HVCs) in the USA. We hypothesize that this pattern applies to hepato-pancreato-biliary (HPB) cancer resections and improved outcomes.

Methods: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) data were analyzed from 1995-1999(T1) to 2005-2009(T2) for all HPB oncologic resections. Division of hospitals into high-, mid-, and low-volume centers (HVC, MVC, LVC) was performed. Multivariate regression was utilized to identify predictors of LVC resection. Outcomes were compared in both eras.

Results: A total of 45,815 cases met the inclusion criteria (19,250 from T1 and 25,565 from T2). At T1, 32.5% of resections were performed at HVCs and 34.9% at LVCs. At T2, 60.8% were performed at HVCs versus 18.5% at LVCs. In T1, inpatient mortality at HVCs versus LVCs was 3.3% versus 8.67% (p < 0.0001) and 2.7% versus 6.5% (p < 0.0001) in T2. LOS and routine discharge were improved in HVCs, but total charges were higher. All outcomes significantly differed between HVCs and LVCs in multivariate analysis, except for LOS and total charges in T2.

Conclusion: The most recent NIS data demonstrate better outcomes in HVCs for HPB oncologic resections. These trends reflect alignment with national recommendations to centralize complex cancer surgery, as well as improved outcomes in all centers.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010 Nov;17(11):2824-31 - PubMed
    1. Arch Surg. 1999 Jan;134(1):30-5 - PubMed
    1. Ann Surg. 2007 Aug;246(2):246-53 - PubMed
    1. JAMA. 2000 Mar 1;283(9):1159-66 - PubMed
    1. N Engl J Med. 1979 Dec 20;301(25):1364-9 - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources