Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2013 Oct;4(2):96-104.
doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1357360.

Outcomes in adult scoliosis patients who undergo spinal fusion stopping at L5 compared with extension to the sacrum

Zeeshan M Sardar  1 , Jean A Ouellet  1 , Dena J Fischer  2 , Andrea C Skelly  2
Affiliations
Review

Outcomes in adult scoliosis patients who undergo spinal fusion stopping at L5 compared with extension to the sacrum

Zeeshan M Sardar et al. Evid Based Spine Care J. 2013 Oct.

Abstract

Study Design Systematic review. Study Rationale Adult scoliosis is a common disorder that is associated with significantly higher pain, functional impairment, and effect on quality of life than those without scoliosis. Surgical spinal fusion has led to quantifiable improvement in patient's quality of life. However, for patients undergoing long lumbar fusion, the decision to stop the fusion at L5 or to extend to S1, particularly if the L5-S1 disc is healthy, remains controversial. Objective The aim of the study is to evaluate if fusion stopping at L5 increases the comparative rates of revision, correction loss, and/or poor functional outcomes compared with extension to the sacrum in adult scoliosis patients who require spinal fusion surgery. Materials and Methods A systematic review of the literature was performed using PubMed, the National Guideline Clearinghouse Database and bibliographies of key articles that evaluated adult scoliosis patients who required spinal fusion surgery and compared outcomes for fusions to the sacrum versus stopping at L5. Articles were included on the basis of predetermined criteria and were appraised using a predefined quality-rating scheme. Results From 111 citations, 26 articles underwent full-text review, and 3 retrospective cohort studies met all inclusion and exclusion criteria. Revision rates in subjects who underwent spinal fusion to L5 (20.8-23.5%) were lower in two studies compared with those with fusion extending to the sacrum (19.0-58.3%). Studies that assessed deformity correction used different measures, making comparison across studies difficult. No significant differences were found in patient-reported functional outcomes across two studies that used different measures. Conclusion The limited data available suggest that differences in revision rates did not consistently reach statistical significance across studies that compared spinal fusion to L5 versus extension to sacrum in adult scoliosis patients.

Keywords: adult; lumbar; sacrum; scoliosis; spinal fusion.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosures Jean Ouellet received no funding pertaining to this article. Funding not related to the current work includes the following: Consulting, Synthes; Teaching, AO Foundation; Fellowship support, AO Foundation; and Research grants, AO Foundation. Zeeshan Sardar has no conflicts of interest or funding sources to disclose.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flowchart showing results of literature search.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Revision rates in adult scoliosis patients who underwent spinal fusion to L5 compared with S1.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kilshaw M, Baker R P, Gardner R, Charosky S, Harding I. Abnormalities of the lumbar spine in the coronal plane on plain abdominal radiographs. Eur Spine J. 2011;20(3):429–433. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schwab F, el-Fegoun A B, Gamez L, Goodman H, Farcy J P. A lumbar classification of scoliosis in the adult patient: preliminary approach. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2005;30(14):1670–1673. - PubMed
    1. Cho K J, Suk S I, Park S R. et al.Arthrodesis to L5 versus S1 in long instrumentation and fusion for degenerative lumbar scoliosis. Eur Spine J. 2009;18(4):531–537. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ohtori S, Sainoh T, Takaso M. et al.Clinical incidence of sacroiliac joint arthritis and pain after sacropelvic fixation for spinal deformity. Yonsei Med J. 2012;53(2):416–421. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Urrutia J, Espinosa J, Diaz-Ledezma C, Cabello C. The impact of lumbar scoliosis on pain, function and health-related quality of life in postmenopausal women. Eur Spine J. 2011;20(12):2223–2227. - PMC - PubMed