Similar articles

• Predicting outcome in the COURAGE trial (Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation): coronary anatomy versus ischemia.

  Mancini GBJ, Hartigan PM, Shaw LJ, Berman DS, Hayes SW, Bates ER, Maron DJ, Teo K, Sedlis SP, Chaitman BR, Weintraub WS, Spertus JA, Kostuk WJ, Dada M, Booth DC, Boden WE. Mancini GBJ, et al. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Feb;7(2):195-201. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.10.017. Epub 2014 Jan 15. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014. PMID: 24440015 Clinical Trial.
• Effect of Coronary Anatomy and Myocardial Ischemia on Long-Term Survival in Patients with Stable Ischemic Heart Disease.

  Weintraub WS, Hartigan PM, Mancini GBJ, Teo KK, Maron DJ, Spertus JA, Chaitman BR, Shaw LJ, Berman D, Boden WE. Weintraub WS, et al. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2019 Feb;12(2):e005079. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.118.005079. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2019. PMID: 30773025
• Ischemia change in stable coronary artery disease is an independent predictor of death and myocardial infarction.

  Farzaneh-Far A, Phillips HR, Shaw LK, Starr AZ, Fiuzat M, O'Connor CM, Sastry A, Shaw LJ, Borges-Neto S. Farzaneh-Far A, et al. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012 Jul;5(7):715-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2012.01.019. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012. PMID: 22789940
• Multi-modality imaging for the assessment of myocardial perfusion with emphasis on stress perfusion CT and MR imaging.

  Ko SM, Hwang HK, Kim SM, Cho IH. Ko SM, et al. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Jun;31 Suppl 1:1-21. doi: 10.1007/s10554-015-0645-7. Epub 2015 Mar 26. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015. PMID: 25809387 Review.
• Diagnostic accuracy of stress myocardial perfusion imaging compared to invasive coronary angiography with fractional flow reserve meta-analysis.

  Takx RA, Blomberg BA, El Aidi H, Habets J, de Jong PA, Nagel E, Hoffmann U, Leiner T. Takx RA, et al. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Jan;8(1):e002666. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.114.002666. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015. PMID: 25596143 Review.