FDA approval of cardiac implantable electronic devices via original and supplement premarket approval pathways, 1979-2012
- PMID: 24449317
- PMCID: PMC4142419
- DOI: 10.1001/jama.2013.284986
FDA approval of cardiac implantable electronic devices via original and supplement premarket approval pathways, 1979-2012
Abstract
Importance: The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) evaluates high-risk medical devices such as cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs), including pacemakers, implantable cardioverter-defibrillators, and cardiac resynchronization therapy devices, via the premarket approval (PMA) process, during which manufacturers submit clinical data demonstrating safety and effectiveness. Subsequent changes to approved high-risk devices are implemented via "supplements," which may not require additional clinical testing.
Objective: To characterize the prevalence and characteristics of changes to CIEDs made through the PMA supplement process.
Design: Using the FDA's PMA database, we reviewed all CIEDs approved as original PMAs or supplements from 1979 through 2012. For each supplement, we collected the date approved, type of supplement (panel-track, 180-day, real-time, special, and 30-day notice), and the nature of the changes. We calculated the number of supplements approved per PMA and analyzed trends relating to different supplement regulatory categories over time. For supplements approved via the 180-day regulatory pathway, which often involve significant design changes, from 2010-2012, we identified how often additional clinical data were collected.
Results: From 1979-2012, the FDA approved 77 original and 5829 supplement PMA applications for CIEDs, with a median of 50 supplements per original PMA (interquartile range [IQR], 23-87). Excluding manufacturing changes that do not alter device design, the number of supplements approved each year was stable around a mean (SD) of 2.6 (0.9) supplements per PMA per year. Premarket approvals remained active via successive supplements over a median period of 15 years (IQR, 8-20), and 79% of the 77 original PMAs approved during our study period were the subject of at least 1 supplement in 2012. Thirty-seven percent of approved supplements involved a change to the device's design. Among 180-day supplements approved from 2010-2012, 23% (15/64) included new clinical data to support safety and effectiveness.
Conclusions and relevance: Many CIED models currently used by clinicians were approved via the PMA supplement process, not as original PMAs. Most new device models are deemed safe and effective without requiring new clinical data, reinforcing the importance of rigorous postapproval surveillance of these devices.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
Comment in
-
Opening the FDA black box.JAMA. 2014 Jan 22-29;311(4):361-3. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.283946. JAMA. 2014. PMID: 24449313 No abstract available.
-
Quality of evidence behind FDA approvals varies widely.BMJ. 2014 Jan 27;348:g1075. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g1075. BMJ. 2014. PMID: 24470635 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
How do Orthopaedic Devices Change After Their Initial FDA Premarket Approval?Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Apr;474(4):1053-68. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4634-x. Epub 2015 Nov 19. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016. PMID: 26584802 Free PMC article.
-
Incremental Revisions across the Life Span of Ophthalmic Devices after Initial Food and Drug Administration Premarket Approval, 1979-2015.Ophthalmology. 2017 Aug;124(8):1237-1246. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.03.040. Epub 2017 May 10. Ophthalmology. 2017. PMID: 28501378
-
Postmarket Modifications of High-Risk Therapeutic Devices in Otolaryngology Cleared by the US Food and Drug Administration.Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015 Sep;153(3):400-8. doi: 10.1177/0194599815587508. Epub 2015 Jun 4. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015. PMID: 26044785
-
Approval of high-risk medical devices in the US: implications for clinical cardiology.Curr Cardiol Rep. 2014;16(6):489. doi: 10.1007/s11886-014-0489-0. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2014. PMID: 24760423 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Analysis of FDA-Approved Orthopaedic Devices and Their Recalls.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016 Mar 16;98(6):517-24. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.15.00286. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016. PMID: 26984921 Review.
Cited by
-
Development of a conceptual framework for reporting modifications in surgical innovation: scoping review.BJS Open. 2023 Mar 7;7(2):zrad020. doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrad020. BJS Open. 2023. PMID: 37104755 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Risk of Recall Associated With Modifications to High-risk Medical Devices Approved Through US Food and Drug Administration Supplements.JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Apr 3;6(4):e237699. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.7699. JAMA Netw Open. 2023. PMID: 37043202 Free PMC article.
-
Fatigue Testing of Wearable Sensing Technologies: Issues and Opportunities.Materials (Basel). 2021 Jul 21;14(15):4070. doi: 10.3390/ma14154070. Materials (Basel). 2021. PMID: 34361264 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Risk of Recall Among Medical Devices Undergoing US Food and Drug Administration 510(k) Clearance and Premarket Approval, 2008-2017.JAMA Netw Open. 2021 May 3;4(5):e217274. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.7274. JAMA Netw Open. 2021. PMID: 33956132 Free PMC article.
-
Postmarket Modifications of High-risk Plastic Surgery Devices.Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020 Feb 19;8(2):e2621. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002621. eCollection 2020 Feb. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020. PMID: 32309074 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Premarket approval (PMA) US Food and Drug Administration; [December, 26, 2013]. http://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/deviceregulationandguidance/howtomarke...
-
- Medical Device Amendments of 1976 [Pub L No. 94-295] US Government Printing Office; [December, 26, 2013]. http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/STATUTE-90/pdf/STATUTE-90-Pg539.pdf.
-
- Hauser RG, Almquist AK. Learning from our mistakes? testing new ICD technology. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(24):2517–2519. - PubMed
-
- Kay GN, Ellenbogen KA. An ICD lead advisory: a plea for more diligence and more data. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2012;35(6):648–649. - PubMed
-
- Premarket approval (PMA) database. US Food and Drug Administration; [January 4, 2013]. http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfPMA/pma.cfm.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
