Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jan;123(1):134-139.
doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000042.

Symptom resolution after operative management of complications from transvaginal mesh

Affiliations

Symptom resolution after operative management of complications from transvaginal mesh

Erin C Crosby et al. Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Jan.

Abstract

Objective: Complications from transvaginal mesh placed for prolapse often require operative management. The aim of this study is to describe the outcomes of vaginal mesh removal.

Methods: A retrospective review of all patients having surgery by the urogynecology group in the department of obstetrics and gynecology at our institution for a complication of transvaginal mesh placed for prolapse was performed. Demographics, presenting symptoms, surgical procedures, and postoperative symptoms were abstracted. Comparative statistics were performed using the χ or Fisher's exact test with significance at P<.05.

Results: Between January 2008 and April 2012, 90 patients had surgery for complications related to vaginal mesh and 84 had follow-up data. The most common presenting signs and symptoms were: mesh exposure, 62% (n=56); pain, 64% (n=58); and dyspareunia, 48% (n=43). During operative management, mesh erosion was encountered unexpectedly in a second area of the vagina in 5% (n=4), in the bladder in 1% (n=1), and in the bowel in 2% (n=2). After vaginal mesh removal, 51% (n=43) had resolution of all presenting symptoms. Mesh exposure was treated successfully in 95% of patients, whereas pain was only successfully treated in 51% of patients.

Conclusion: Removal of vaginal mesh is helpful in relieving symptoms of presentation. Patients can be reassured that exposed mesh can almost always be successfully managed surgically, but pain and dyspareunia are only resolved completely in half of patients.

Level of evidence: III.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Financial Disclosure: Dr. Delancey is a consultant for American Medical Systems. The other authors did not report any potential conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Mesh removal procedures performed in the urogynecology division at a tertiary referral center.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Symptoms before and after mesh removal.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Change in pain after mesh removal.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Rogowski A, Bienkowski P, Tosiak A, Jerzak M, Mierzejewski P, Baranowski W. Mesh retraction correlates with vaginal pain and overactive bladder symptoms after anterior vaginal mesh repair. Int Urogynecol J. 2013 - PubMed
    1. Skala CE, Renezeder K, Albrich S, et al. Mesh complications following prolapse surgery: management and outcome. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011;159:453–456. - PubMed
    1. Baessler K, Hewson AD, Tunn R, Schuessler B, Maher CF. Severe mesh complications following intravaginal slingplasty. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;106:713–716. - PubMed
    1. Huebner M, Hsu Y, Fenner DE. The use of graft materials in vaginal pelvic floor surgery. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2006;92:279–288. - PubMed
    1. FDA Public Health Notification: Serious Complications Associated with Transvaginal Placement of Surgical Mesh in Repair of Pelvic Organ Prolapse and Stress Urinary Incontinence. [Accessed August 3, 2012];2011 at http://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/safety/alertsandnotices/publichealthno....) - PubMed