Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jan;123(1):134-9.
doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000042.

Symptom Resolution After Operative Management of Complications From Transvaginal Mesh

Affiliations
Free PMC article

Symptom Resolution After Operative Management of Complications From Transvaginal Mesh

Erin C Crosby et al. Obstet Gynecol. .
Free PMC article

Abstract

Objective: Complications from transvaginal mesh placed for prolapse often require operative management. The aim of this study is to describe the outcomes of vaginal mesh removal.

Methods: A retrospective review of all patients having surgery by the urogynecology group in the department of obstetrics and gynecology at our institution for a complication of transvaginal mesh placed for prolapse was performed. Demographics, presenting symptoms, surgical procedures, and postoperative symptoms were abstracted. Comparative statistics were performed using the χ or Fisher's exact test with significance at P<.05.

Results: Between January 2008 and April 2012, 90 patients had surgery for complications related to vaginal mesh and 84 had follow-up data. The most common presenting signs and symptoms were: mesh exposure, 62% (n=56); pain, 64% (n=58); and dyspareunia, 48% (n=43). During operative management, mesh erosion was encountered unexpectedly in a second area of the vagina in 5% (n=4), in the bladder in 1% (n=1), and in the bowel in 2% (n=2). After vaginal mesh removal, 51% (n=43) had resolution of all presenting symptoms. Mesh exposure was treated successfully in 95% of patients, whereas pain was only successfully treated in 51% of patients.

Conclusion: Removal of vaginal mesh is helpful in relieving symptoms of presentation. Patients can be reassured that exposed mesh can almost always be successfully managed surgically, but pain and dyspareunia are only resolved completely in half of patients.

Level of evidence: III.

Conflict of interest statement

Financial Disclosure: Dr. Delancey is a consultant for American Medical Systems. The other authors did not report any potential conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Mesh removal procedures performed in the urogynecology division at a tertiary referral center.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Symptoms before and after mesh removal.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Change in pain after mesh removal.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 12 articles

See all "Cited by" articles
Feedback