Effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with resectable colorectal liver metastases

PLoS One. 2014 Jan 21;9(1):e86543. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0086543. eCollection 2014.

Abstract

Background: Whether patients with resectable colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) receive survival benefit from neoadjuvant chemotherapy remains controversial.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 466 patients with resectable CRLM between 2000 and 2010. Patient characteristics and survival data were recorded.

Results: The patients were divided into one group with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (group NC, n = 121) and another without (group WN, n = 345). There was no difference in 5-year survival (52% vs. 48%) between the two groups. No significant differences were identified between the two groups in terms of 30-day mortality (1.7% vs. 1.2%) or morbidity (33.9% vs. 25.8%). A primary tumor at stage T4, ≥4 liver metastases, the largest liver metastasis ≥5 cm in diameter, and a serum CEA level ≥5 ng/ml were independent prognostic factors. By assigning one point to each, the patients were divided into a low-risk group (0-2) and a high-risk (3-4). The patients in the low-risk group received no survival benefit from neoadjuvant chemotherapy, whereas those in the high-risk group received survival benefit (5-year survival, 39% vs. 33%, P = 0.028).

Conclusions: Preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy did not increase mortality or complications. Not all resectable patients, only those with >2 independent risk factors, received survival benefit from neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Chemotherapy, Adjuvant / methods
  • Colorectal Neoplasms / drug therapy*
  • Colorectal Neoplasms / pathology
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Liver Neoplasms / drug therapy*
  • Liver Neoplasms / pathology
  • Liver Neoplasms / secondary*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Neoadjuvant Therapy / methods
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Treatment Outcome

Grants and funding

The study was supported by Key Projects of the Clinical Disciplines, which is administered by the Ministry of Health (Projects from 2010–2012), the National Natural Science Foundation (30973416, 81101566), and the Talent Fund of Shanghai Municipal Health Bureau (XYQ2011017, XBR2011031). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.