[How to read and understand Registries for Evaluating Patient Outcomes: A User's Guide (2nd Edition)]
- PMID: 24471311
[How to read and understand Registries for Evaluating Patient Outcomes: A User's Guide (2nd Edition)]
Abstract
Registry studies (RS) get more and more attention in recent years because it can reflect the health care situations of the real world. There are a number of large scale RS for traditional Chinese medicine (TCM). RS are observational studies that can complement randomized controlled trials (RCT). RS have an irreplaceable position in real word study (RWS), especially for small probability events. There are some different characters and qualities in RS. Registries for Evaluating Patient Outcomes: A User's Guide (2nd Edition) was published by the agency for healthcare research and quality (AHRQ) in 2010. It described the details of how to establish, maintain, and evaluate RS, and using 38 RS samples to illustrate the possible problems in undertaking such research. The User's Guide (2nd Edition) provides a reliable reference document for RS. TCM injections post-marketing safety surveillance RS is a national program involving multiple centers in China. This program can further improve RS quality their application in China and is a good illustration of how to follow this guide accurately.
Similar articles
-
[Clinical outcomes research of traditional Chinese medicine--introduce registry intensive hospital monitoring study protocol of traditiona Chinese medicine injection's safety].Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi. 2012 Sep;37(18):2683-5. Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi. 2012. PMID: 23285907 Chinese.
-
[Real-world study: a potential new approach to effectiveness evaluation of traditional Chinese medicine interventions].Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Xue Bao. 2010 Apr;8(4):301-6. doi: 10.3736/jcim20100401. Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Xue Bao. 2010. PMID: 20388468 Chinese.
-
[Significance of re-evaluation and development of Chinese herbal drugs].Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi. 2012 Jan;37(1):1-4. Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi. 2012. PMID: 22741451 Chinese.
-
A user's guide to the disease management literature: recommendations for reporting and assessing program outcomes.Am J Manag Care. 2005 Feb;11(2):113-20. Am J Manag Care. 2005. PMID: 15726859 Review.
-
21st Century Patient Registries: Registries for Evaluating Patient Outcomes: A User’s Guide: 3rd Edition, Addendum [Internet].Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2018 Mar. Report No.: 17(18)-EHC013-EF. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2018 Mar. Report No.: 17(18)-EHC013-EF. PMID: 29708678 Free Books & Documents. Review.
Cited by
-
Electronic Health Record (EHR) Abstraction.Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2021 Mar 15;18(Spring):1g. eCollection 2021 Spring. Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2021. PMID: 34035788 Free PMC article.
-
The influence of preoperative determinants on quality of life, functioning and pain after total knee and hip replacement: a pooled analysis of Dutch cohorts.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018 Mar 2;19(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s12891-018-1991-0. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018. PMID: 29499692 Free PMC article.
-
New methods for determining comparative effectiveness in rheumatoid arthritis.Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2013 May;25(3):325-33. doi: 10.1097/BOR.0b013e32835fd8c0. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2013. PMID: 23508131 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Representativeness of a national heart failure quality-of-care registry: comparison of OPTIMIZE-HF and non-OPTIMIZE-HF Medicare patients.Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2009 Jul;2(4):377-84. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.108.822692. Epub 2009 Jun 9. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2009. PMID: 20031864 Free PMC article.