Endocrine profile following stimulation with recombinant follicle stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone versus highly purified human menopausal gonadotropin
- PMID: 24476504
- PMCID: PMC3907361
- DOI: 10.1186/1477-7827-12-10
Endocrine profile following stimulation with recombinant follicle stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone versus highly purified human menopausal gonadotropin
Abstract
Background: Luteinizing hormone (LH) activity in human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) preparations is derived from human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) rather than LH. Therefore, we aimed to determine whether there are similarities in the endocrine and follicular profiles of serum and follicular fluid from controlled ovarian stimulation with the recombinant gonadotropins follicle-stimulating hormone plus luteinizing hormone (rFSH + rLH) or highly purified human menopausal gonadotropin (HP-hMG).
Methods: We performed a prospective observational study with 50 oocyte donors that received either a combination of recombinant gonadotropins (rFSH + rLH) or a mixture of urinary gonadotropins (HP-hMG) plus purified urinary FSH (uFSH). Results were analyzed using Student's t-test to compare continuous variables and the chi-squared test to compare proportions. P-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Results: Although more oocytes were retrieved after treatment with recombinant than urinary gonadotropins (16.5 vs. 11.8; P = 0.049), a higher proportion of metaphase II ova (71.2% vs. 80.6%; P = 0.003) were obtained using urinary gonadotropins. On day 6 and on the day of triggering, serum steroid hormone levels were slightly but not significantly elevated in the recombinant group compared with the urinary group. In follicular fluid, no statistical differences were observed for intra-follicular levels of steroid hormones between the two protocols; ongoing pregnancy rates were similar (46.1% vs. 46.1%).
Conclusions: Our data suggest that endocrinological and follicular profiles do not differ between rFSH + rLH and HP-hMG stimulation.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Recombinant follicular stimulating hormone plus recombinant luteinizing hormone versus human menopausal gonadotropins- does the source of LH bioactivity affect ovarian stimulation outcome?Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2021 Dec 9;19(1):182. doi: 10.1186/s12958-021-00853-7. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2021. PMID: 34886872 Free PMC article.
-
Highly purified hMG versus recombinant FSH plus recombinant LH in intrauterine insemination cycles in women ≥35 years: a RCT.Hum Reprod. 2015 Jan;30(1):179-85. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deu302. Epub 2014 Nov 14. Hum Reprod. 2015. PMID: 25398971 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of the combination of recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone and recombinant luteinizing hormone protocol versus human menopausal gonadotropin protocol in controlled ovarian stimulation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.J Evid Based Med. 2020 Aug;13(3):215-226. doi: 10.1111/jebm.12390. Epub 2020 Jul 6. J Evid Based Med. 2020. PMID: 32627395
-
Recombinant luteinizing hormone (rLH) and recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (rFSH) for ovarian stimulation in IVF/ICSI cycles.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 May 24;5(5):CD005070. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005070.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. PMID: 28537052 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Recombinant gonadotropins.Curr Womens Health Rep. 2001 Oct;1(2):157-63. Curr Womens Health Rep. 2001. PMID: 12112963 Review.
Cited by
-
Introduce an optimal method of ovarian stimulation in the polycystic ovarian syndrome affected: a randomized controlled trial.BMC Womens Health. 2023 Jun 20;23(1):323. doi: 10.1186/s12905-023-02473-2. BMC Womens Health. 2023. PMID: 37340371 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Luteinizing hormone supplementation in women with hypogonadotropic hypogonadism seeking fertility care: Insights from a narrative review.Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022 Aug 1;13:907249. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.907249. eCollection 2022. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022. PMID: 35979440 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Controlled ovarian stimulation with r-FSH plus r-LH vs. HMG plus r-FSH in patients candidate for IVF/ICSI cycles: An RCT.Int J Reprod Biomed. 2017 Jul;15(7):435-440. Int J Reprod Biomed. 2017. PMID: 29177245 Free PMC article.
-
A Comparison of Outcomes from In Vitro Fertilization Cycles Stimulated with Follicle Stimulating Hormone Plus either Recombinant Luteinizing Hormone or Human Menopausal Gonadotropins in Subjects Treated with Long Gonadotropin Releasing Hormone Agonist Protocols.Int J Fertil Steril. 2017 Jul-Sep;11(2):79-84. doi: 10.22074/ijfs.2017.4759. Epub 2017 Feb 16. Int J Fertil Steril. 2017. PMID: 28670424 Free PMC article.
-
Pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and clinical aspects of ovulation induction agents: A review of the literature.J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2017 Mar 15;18(1):48-55. doi: 10.4274/jtgga.2016.0107. J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2017. PMID: 28506951 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Devroey P, Pellicer A, Nyboe Andersen A, Arce JC. Menopur in GnRH Antagonist Cycles with Single Embryo Transfer Trial Group. A randomized assessor-blind trial comparing highly purified hMG and recombinant FSH in a GnRH antagonist cycle with compulsory single-blastocyst transfer. Fertil Steril. 2012;97:561–571. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.12.016. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Van Wely M, Westergaard LG, Bossuyt PMM, Van der Veen F. Human menopausal gonadotropin versus recombinant follicle stimulation hormone for ovarian stimulation in assisted reproductive cycles (Review), Cochrane Database of Systematic reviews. The Cochrane Collaboration, Published by John Wiley and sons, Ltd; 2003. - PubMed
-
- Smitz J, Andersen AN, Devroey P, Arce JC. MERIT Group. Endocrine profile in serum and follicular fluid differs after ovarian stimulation with HP-hMG or recombinant FSH in IVF patients. Hum Reprod. 2007;22:676–687. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
