Radiation dose index of renal colic protocol CT studies in the United States: a report from the American College of Radiology National Radiology Data Registry
- PMID: 24484064
- PMCID: PMC5341688
- DOI: 10.1148/radiol.14131601
Radiation dose index of renal colic protocol CT studies in the United States: a report from the American College of Radiology National Radiology Data Registry
Abstract
Purpose: To determine radiation dose indexes for computed tomography (CT) performed with renal colic protocols in the United States, including frequency of reduced-dose technique usage and any institutional-level factors associated with high or low dose indexes.
Materials and methods: The Dose Imaging Registry (DIR) collects deidentified CT data, including examination type and dose indexes, for CT performed at participating institutions; thus, the DIR portion of the study was exempt from institutional review board approval and was HIPAA compliant. CT dose indexes were examined at the institutional level for CT performed with a renal colic protocol at institutions that contributed at least 10 studies to the registry as of January 2013. Additionally, patients undergoing CT for renal colic at a single institution (with institutional review board approval and informed consent from prospective subjects and waiver of consent from retrospective subjects) were studied to examine individual renal colic CT dose index patterns and explore relationships between patient habitus, demographics, and dose indexes. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze dose indexes, and linear regression and Spearman correlations were used to examine relationships between dose indexes and institutional factors.
Results: There were 49 903 renal colic protocol CT examinations conducted at 93 institutions between May 2011 and January 2013. Mean age ± standard deviation was 49 years ± 18, and 53.9% of patients were female. Institutions contributed a median of 268 (interquartile range, 77-699) CT studies. Overall mean institutional dose-length product (DLP) was 746 mGy ⋅ cm (effective dose, 11.2 mSv), with a range of 307-1497 mGy ⋅ cm (effective dose, 4.6-22.5 mSv) for mean DLPs. Only 2% of studies were conducted with a DLP of 200 mGy ⋅ cm or lower (a "reduced dose") (effective dose, 3 mSv), and only 10% of institutions kept DLP at 400 mGy ⋅ cm (effective dose, 6 mSv) or less in at least 50% of patients.
Conclusion: Reduced-dose renal protocol CT is used infrequently in the United States. Mean dose index is higher than reported previously, and institutional variation is substantial.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01352676.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
Comment in
-
Radiation dose reduction in renal colic protocol CT: are we doing enough to ensure adoption of best practices?Radiology. 2014 May;271(2):323-5. doi: 10.1148/radiol.14140455. Radiology. 2014. PMID: 24761953 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Radiation Doses in Consecutive CT Examinations from Five University of California Medical Centers.Radiology. 2015 Oct;277(1):134-41. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2015142728. Epub 2015 May 19. Radiology. 2015. PMID: 25988262 Free PMC article.
-
Identifying Institutional Diagnostic Reference Levels for CT with Radiation Dose Index Monitoring Software.Radiology. 2015 Aug;276(2):507-17. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2015141520. Epub 2015 Apr 20. Radiology. 2015. PMID: 25897474
-
Submillisievert median radiation dose for coronary angiography with a second-generation 320-detector row CT scanner in 107 consecutive patients.Radiology. 2013 Apr;267(1):76-85. doi: 10.1148/radiol.13122621. Epub 2013 Jan 22. Radiology. 2013. PMID: 23340461 Free PMC article.
-
How to perform low-dose computed tomography for renal colic in clinical practice.Diagn Interv Imaging. 2016 Apr;97(4):393-400. doi: 10.1016/j.diii.2015.05.013. Epub 2015 Oct 27. Diagn Interv Imaging. 2016. PMID: 26522944 Review.
-
American College of Radiology Dose Index Registry: A User's Guide for Cardiothoracic Radiologists Part 1: Dose Index Registry (DIR)-What it Means and Does for CT?J Thorac Imaging. 2015 Nov;30(6):W66-8. doi: 10.1097/RTI.0000000000000184. J Thorac Imaging. 2015. PMID: 26458238 Review.
Cited by
-
Ultrasound-Guided PCNL - Why Are We Still Performing Exclusively Fluoroscopic Access?Curr Urol Rep. 2023 Jul;24(7):335-343. doi: 10.1007/s11934-023-01163-8. Epub 2023 May 6. Curr Urol Rep. 2023. PMID: 37148423 Review.
-
Dual-energy CT kidney stone characterization-can diagnostic accuracy be achieved at low radiation dose?Eur Radiol. 2023 Sep;33(9):6238-6244. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-09569-1. Epub 2023 Mar 29. Eur Radiol. 2023. PMID: 36988716 Free PMC article.
-
Feasibility of photon-counting CT for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome evaluation: lower radiation dose and improved diagnostic confidence.Skeletal Radiol. 2023 Sep;52(9):1651-1659. doi: 10.1007/s00256-023-04325-4. Epub 2023 Mar 27. Skeletal Radiol. 2023. PMID: 36971838
-
Computed Tomography Radiation Exposure among Urinary Tract Stone Patients at Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital: A Retrospective Study.Ethiop J Health Sci. 2022 Oct;32(Spec Iss 1):33-40. doi: 10.4314/ejhs.v32i1.6S. Ethiop J Health Sci. 2022. PMID: 36339957 Free PMC article.
-
Application of deep learning reconstruction of ultra-low-dose abdominal CT in the diagnosis of renal calculi.Insights Imaging. 2022 Oct 8;13(1):163. doi: 10.1186/s13244-022-01300-w. Insights Imaging. 2022. PMID: 36209195 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Moe OW. Kidney stones: pathophysiology and medical management. Lancet. 2006;367(9507):333–344. - PubMed
-
- Stamatelou KK, Francis ME, Jones CA, Nyberg LMJ, Curhan GC. Time trends in reported prevalence of kidney stones in the United States: 1976–1994. Kidney Int. 2003;63(5):1817–1823. - PubMed
-
- Ljunghall S, Danielson BG. A prospective study of renal stone recurrences. Br J Urol. 1984;56(2):122–124. - PubMed
-
- Smith RC, Rosenfield AT, Choe KA, et al. Acute flank pain: comparison of non–contrast-enhanced CT and intravenous urography. Radiology. 1995;194(3):789–794. - PubMed
-
- Tamm EP, Silverman PM, Shuman WP. Evaluation of the patient with flank pain and possible ureteral calculus. Radiology. 2003;228(2):319–329. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
