Late detection of critical congenital heart disease among US infants: estimation of the potential impact of proposed universal screening using pulse oximetry
- PMID: 24493342
- PMCID: PMC4470377
- DOI: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.4779
Late detection of critical congenital heart disease among US infants: estimation of the potential impact of proposed universal screening using pulse oximetry
Abstract
Importance: Critical congenital heart disease (CCHD) was added to the Recommended Uniform Screening Panel for Newborns in the United States in 2011. Many states have recently adopted or are considering requirements for universal CCHD screening through pulse oximetry in birth hospitals. Limited previous research is directly applicable to the question of how many US infants with CCHD might be identified through screening.
Objectives: To estimate the proportion of US infants with late detection of CCHD (>3 days after birth) based on existing clinical practice and to investigate factors associated with late detection.
Design, setting, and participants: Descriptive and multivariable analysis. Data were obtained from a multisite population-based study of birth defects in the United States, the National Birth Defects Prevention Study (NBDPS). We included all live-born infants with estimated dates of delivery from January 1, 1998, through December 31, 2007, and nonsyndromic, clinically verified CCHD conditions potentially detectable through screening via pulse oximetry.
Main outcomes and measures: The main outcome measure was the proportion of infants with late detection of CCHD through echocardiography or at autopsy under the assumption that universal screening at birth hospitals might reduce the number of such late diagnoses. Secondary outcome measures included prevalence ratios for associations between selected demographic and clinical factors and late detection of CCHD.
Results: Of 3746 live-born infants with nonsyndromic CCHD, late detection occurred in 1106 (29.5% [95% CI, 28.1%-31.0%]), including 6 (0.2%) (0.1%-0.4%) first receiving a diagnosis at autopsy more than 3 days after birth. Late detection varied by CCHD type from 9 of 120 infants (7.5% [95% CI, 3.5%-13.8%]) with pulmonary atresia to 497 of 801 (62.0% [58.7%-65.4%]) with coarctation of the aorta. In multivariable analysis, late detection varied significantly by CCHD type and study site, and infants with extracardiac defects were significantly less likely to have late detection of CCHD (adjusted prevalence ratio, 0.58 [95% CI, 0.49-0.69]).
Conclusions and relevance: We estimate that 29.5% of live-born infants with nonsyndromic CCHD in the NBDPS received a diagnosis more than 3 days after birth and therefore might have benefited from routine CCHD screening at birth hospitals. The number of infants in whom CCHD was detected through screening likely varies by several factors, including CCHD type. Additional population-based studies of screening in practice are needed.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
Comment in
-
Potential--and potential pitfalls--of screening newborns for critical congenital heart disease.JAMA Pediatr. 2014 Apr;168(4):311-2. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.5238. JAMA Pediatr. 2014. PMID: 24493232 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Pulse oximetry screening for critical congenital heart defects.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Mar 1;3(3):CD011912. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011912.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018. PMID: 29494750 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Factors associated with late detection of critical congenital heart disease in newborns.Pediatrics. 2013 Sep;132(3):e604-11. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-1002. Epub 2013 Aug 12. Pediatrics. 2013. PMID: 23940249 Free PMC article.
-
Hospitalizations, costs, and mortality among infants with critical congenital heart disease: how important is timely detection?Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2013 Oct;97(10):664-72. doi: 10.1002/bdra.23165. Epub 2013 Sep 2. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2013. PMID: 24000201 Free PMC article.
-
Cost-effectiveness of routine screening for critical congenital heart disease in US newborns.Pediatrics. 2013 Sep;132(3):e595-603. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-0332. Epub 2013 Aug 5. Pediatrics. 2013. PMID: 23918890 Free PMC article.
-
Newborn screening for congenital heart defects: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis.Health Technol Assess. 2005 Nov;9(44):1-152, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta9440. Health Technol Assess. 2005. PMID: 16297355 Review.
Cited by
-
The Performance of Critical Congenital Heart Disease Screening in Rural Versus Urban Locations in the Northwest United States.J Pediatr Clin Pract. 2024 Jul 4;14:200120. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedcp.2024.200120. eCollection 2024 Dec. J Pediatr Clin Pract. 2024. PMID: 39314999 Free PMC article.
-
Cost-utility analysis of prenatal diagnosis of congenital cardiac diseases using deep learning.Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2024 May 22;22(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s12962-024-00550-3. Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2024. PMID: 38773527 Free PMC article.
-
Congenital heart disease detection by pediatric electrocardiogram based deep learning integrated with human concepts.Nat Commun. 2024 Feb 1;15(1):976. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-44930-y. Nat Commun. 2024. PMID: 38302502 Free PMC article.
-
Diagnostic Accuracy of Physical Examination and Pulse Oximetry for Critical Congenital Cardiac Disease Screening in Newborns.Children (Basel). 2023 Dec 29;11(1):47. doi: 10.3390/children11010047. Children (Basel). 2023. PMID: 38255361 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Arch watch: current approaches and opportunities for improvement.J Perinatol. 2024 Mar;44(3):325-332. doi: 10.1038/s41372-023-01854-7. Epub 2023 Dec 21. J Perinatol. 2024. PMID: 38129600 Review.
References
-
- Mahle WT, Newburger JW, Matherne GP, et al. American Heart Association Congenital Heart Defects Committee of the Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young, Council on Cardiovascular Nursing, and Interdisciplinary Council on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research; American Academy of Pediatrics Section on Cardiology and Cardiac Surgery, and Committee on Fetus and Newborn. Role of pulse oximetry in examining newborns for congenital heart disease: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association and American Academy of Pediatrics. Circulation. 2009;120(5):447–458. - PubMed
-
- Kemper AR, Mahle WT, Martin GR, et al. Strategies for implementing screening for critical congenital heart disease. Pediatrics. 2011;128(5):e1259–e1267. - PubMed
-
- Ewer AK. Review of pulse oximetry screening for critical congenital heart defects in newborn infants. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2013;28(2):92–96. - PubMed
-
- Discretionary Advisory Committee on Heritable Disorders in Newborns and Children. [Accessed November 1, 2011];HHS Secretary adopts recommendation to add critical congenital heart disease to the recommended uniform screening panel. http://www.hrsa.gov/advisorycommittees/mchbadvisory/heritabledisorders/i.... Published 2011.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
