Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2014 Feb 4:14:23.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2377-14-23.

Recurrent stroke risk is high after a single cerebrovascular event in patients with symptomatic 50-99% carotid stenosis: a cohort study

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Recurrent stroke risk is high after a single cerebrovascular event in patients with symptomatic 50-99% carotid stenosis: a cohort study

Elias Johansson et al. BMC Neurol. .

Abstract

Background: Recurrent TIAs are thought to signal a high stroke risk. The aim of this study is to examine if repeated ischemic events increase the risk of recurrent ipsilateral stroke among patients with symptomatic 50-99% carotid stenosis.

Methods: This is a secondary analysis of the ANSYSCAP study, where we analyzed recurrent ipsilateral ischemic stroke before carotid endarterectomy in 230 consecutive patients with symptomatic 50-99% carotid stenosis. Here, we further analyzed the patients according to if they were clinically stable, unstable or highly unstable - respectively defined as having 0, 1 or ≥2 additional ipsilateral events within 7 days before and/or after the ischemic cerebrovascular event for which the patient sought health care (the presenting event).

Results: Of the 230 included patients, 155 (67%) were clinically stable, 47 (20%) were clinically unstable and 28 (12%) were clinically highly unstable. Eighteen patients suffered a stroke within 7 days; of these patients, 12 (67%) were clinically stable. The risk of recurrent ipsilateral ischemic stroke within 7 days was equally high for clinically stable (8%), unstable (9%) and highly unstable (7%) patients. Fourteen patients had 3-11 additional ipsilateral events; of these patients, only one suffered a recurrent ipsilateral ischemic stroke.

Conclusions: The seemingly clinical stable symptomatic 50-99% carotid stenosis patients without additional ipsilateral events have a high risk of recurrent stroke. Patients without additional events should undergo preoperative evaluation and carotid endarterectomy in the same expedient manner as patients with additional events.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Prevalence of additional ipsilateral events. Numbers inside bars denotes number of patients. PE = presenting event; RAO = retinal artery occlusion; Afx = amaurosis fugax; LAA = large artery atherosclerosis
Figure 2
Figure 2
Kaplan Meier analysis of the risk of recurrent ipsilateral stroke after the presenting event with patients divided by number of events within 7 days before and/or after the presenting event: Clinically stable (0 events), clinically unstable (1 event), and clinically highly unstable (≥2 events). CEA was used a censor.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Kaplan Meier analysis of the risk of recurrent ipsilateral stroke after the presenting event with patients divided by number of additional events within 7 days before the presenting event. CEA was used a censor.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Kaplan Meier analysis of the risk of recurrent ipsilateral stroke after the presenting event with patients divided by number of additional events within 7 days after the presenting event. CEA was used a censor.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Type of presenting event among the patients with recurrent ipsilateral ischemic stroke within 7 days divided between clinically stable, unstable and highly unstable. Numbers inside bars denotes number of patients.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Merwick Á, Albers GW, Amarenco P, Arsava WM, Ay H, Calvet D, Coutts SB, Cucchiara BL, Demchuk AM, Furie KL, Giles MF, Labreuche J, Lavallée PC, Mas JL, Olivot JM, Purroy F, Rothwell PM, Saver JL, Sheehan OC, Stack JP, Kelly PJ. Addition of brain and carotid imaging to the ABCD2 score to identify patients at early risk of stroke after transient ischaemic attack: a multicentre observational study. Lancet Neurol. 2010;9:1060–1069. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(10)70240-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Marnane M, Ni Chroinin D, Callaly E, Sheehan OC, Merwick A, Hannon N, Horgan G, Kyne L, Moroney J, McCormack PME, Dolan E, Duggan J, Williams D, Kelly PJ. Stroke recurrence within the time window recommended for carotid endarterectomy. Neurology. 2011;77:738–743. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31822b00cf. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rerkasem K, Rothwell PM. Systematic review of the operative risks of carotid endarterectomy for recently symptomatic stenosis in relation to the timing of surgery. Stroke. 2009;40:e564–e572. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.558528. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Goodney PP, Likosky DS, Cronenwett JL. Factors associated with stroke or death after carotid endarterectomy in Northern New England. J Vasc Surg. 2008;48:1139–1145. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.05.013. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Strömberg S, Gelin J, Österberg T, Bergström GML, Karlström L, Österberg K. for the Swedish Vascular Registry (Swedvasc) Steering Committee. Very urgent carotid endarterectomy confers increased procedural risk. Stroke. 2012;43:1331–1335. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.639344. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms