Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
, 16 (2), e33

The 1% Rule in Four Digital Health Social Networks: An Observational Study

Affiliations
Observational Study

The 1% Rule in Four Digital Health Social Networks: An Observational Study

Trevor van Mierlo. J Med Internet Res.

Abstract

Background: In recent years, cyberculture has informally reported a phenomenon named the 1% rule, or 90-9-1 principle, which seeks to explain participatory patterns and network effects within Internet communities. The rule states that 90% of actors observe and do not participate, 9% contribute sparingly, and 1% of actors create the vast majority of new content. This 90%, 9%, and 1% are also known as Lurkers, Contributors, and Superusers, respectively. To date, very little empirical research has been conducted to verify the 1% rule.

Objective: The 1% rule is widely accepted in digital marketing. Our goal was to determine if the 1% rule applies to moderated Digital Health Social Networks (DHSNs) designed to facilitate behavior change.

Methods: To help gain insight into participatory patterns, descriptive data were extracted from four long-standing DHSNs: the AlcoholHelpCenter, DepressionCenter, PanicCenter, and StopSmokingCenter sites.

Results: During the study period, 63,990 actors created 578,349 posts. Less than 25% of actors made one or more posts. The applicability of the 1% rule was confirmed as Lurkers, Contributors, and Superusers accounted for a weighted average of 1.3% (n=4668), 24.0% (n=88,732), and 74.7% (n=276,034) of content.

Conclusions: The 1% rule was consistent across the four DHSNs. As social network sustainability requires fresh content and timely interactions, these results are important for organizations actively promoting and managing Internet communities. Superusers generate the vast majority of traffic and create value, so their recruitment and retention is imperative for long-term success. Although Lurkers may benefit from observing interactions between Superusers and Contributors, they generate limited or no network value. The results of this study indicate that DHSNs may be optimized to produce network effects, positive externalities, and bandwagon effects. Further research in the development and expansion of DHSNs is required.

Keywords: 1% rule; 90-9-1 principle; Pareto Principal; Superusers; eHealth; moderated support; social networks.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: Trevor van Mierlo is the CEO & Founder of Evolution Health Systems Inc, the owner of the sites AlcoholHelpCenter, DepressionCenter, PanicCenter, and StopSmokingCenter, as well as other eHealth and mHealth platforms.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Network content according to the 1% rule.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Cumulative DHSN population distribution and content creation according to the 1% rule.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 38 PubMed Central articles

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Robinson TN, Walters PA. Health-net: an interactive computer network for campus health promotion. J Am Coll Health. 1986 Jun;34(6):284–5. doi: 10.1080/07448481.1986.9938952. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schneider SJ. Trial of an on-line behavioral smoking cessation program. Computers in Human Behavior. 1986 Jan;2(4):277–286. doi: 10.1016/0747-5632(86)90008-7. - DOI
    1. Cobb NK, Graham AL, Abrams DB. Social network structure of a large online community for smoking cessation. Am J Public Health. 2010 Jul;100(7):1282–9. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.165449. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Stoddard JL, Augustson EM, Moser RP. Effect of adding a virtual community (bulletin board) to smokefree.gov: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2008;10(5):e53. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1124. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zbikowski SM, Hapgood J, Smucker Barnwell S, McAfee T. Phone and web-based tobacco cessation treatment: real-world utilization patterns and outcomes for 11,000 tobacco users. J Med Internet Res. 2008;10(5):e41. doi: 10.2196/jmir.999. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Feedback