Background: Pulmonary metastasectomy has become a standard approach for sarcoma, but uncertainty remains regarding risk factors that accurately assess postoperative prognosis and can be used to guide surgical decision making.
Methods: We identified 145 patients who underwent 204 consecutive pulmonary metastasectomies for sarcoma between 1996 and 2009, and examined 174 complete resections in 118 patients. Predictors included surgical procedure, number/size of lesions, repeat resection, intervals to metastasis and to recurrence, chemotherapy, sarcoma subtype, distribution of pulmonary and extrapulmonary metastasis, and patient age/sex. Survival estimates were based on Kaplan-Meier analysis and compared using a log-rank test. Predictors were compared using univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards modeling.
Results: Among patients undergoing R0 resections, median survival was 35 months (95% confidence interval, 22-60 months), with 3-, 5- and 10-year survival of 48%, 42%, and 31%, respectively. The number or size of lesions did not influence survival. Metastasis synchronous to the primary tumor, but not disease-free interval, was a significant predictor of worse survival on single variable and adjusted modeling (hazard ratio, 3.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.4-6.6; P = .005); the presence of extrapulmonary metastasis and a need for anatomic resection were also likely predictors (P = .06 and P = .07). Recurrence of pulmonary metastasis was not associated with a reduction in survival if completely resected, and a more aggressive and less invasive surgical approach during the later half of the study period was not associated with a significant decline in survival.
Conclusions: Evolving surgical practice may allow an increasingly aggressive approach to pulmonary sarcoma metastasis, which may be facilitated by increased use of a minimally invasive approach.
Copyright © 2014 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.