Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Feb;25(1):332-56.
doi: 10.1353/hpu.2014.0050.

Race/ethnicity and the socioeconomic status gradient in women's cancer screening utilization: a case of diminishing returns?

Race/ethnicity and the socioeconomic status gradient in women's cancer screening utilization: a case of diminishing returns?

Shannon M Monnat. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2014 Feb.

Abstract

Using three years (2006, 2008, 2010) of nationally representative data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, I assessed the socioeconomic status (SES) gradient for odds of receiving a mammogram in the past two years and a Pap test in the past three years among White, Black, Hispanic, and Asian women living in the U.S. Mammogram and Pap test utilization were less likely among low-SES women. However, women of color experience less benefit than Whites from increasing SES for both screenings; as income and education increased, White women experienced more pronounced increases in the likelihood of being screened than did women of color. In what might be referred to as paradoxical returns, Asian women actually experienced a decline in the likelihood of obtaining a recent Pap test at higher levels of education. My findings suggest that women of color differ from Whites in the extent to which increasing socioeconomic resources is associated with increasing cancer screening utilization.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Percentages of women reporting recent mammogram and pap test by race/ethnicity. ***p < .001 significantly different from Whites; two- tailed test.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Predicted probabilities of mammogram use by race/ethnicity and household income.a aAll control variables held at means (Weighted Based on results from Model 3).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Predicted probabilities of pap test use by race/ethnicity and household income.a aAll control variables held at means (Based on results from Model 4).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Predicted probabilities of mammogram use by race/ethnicity and educational attainment.a aAll control variables held at means (Based on results from Model 5).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Predicted probabilities of pap test use by race/ethnicity and educational attainment.a aAll control variables held at means (Based on results from Model 6).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. American Cancer Society. Cancer facts & figures 2011. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society; 2011.
    1. Hendrick RE, Helvie MA. United States Preventive Screening Task Force screening mammography recommendations: science ignored. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Feb;196(2):W112–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.2214/AJR.10.5609. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Breen N, Wagener DK, Brown ML, et al. Progress in cancer screening over a decade: results of cancer screening from the 1987, 1992, and 1998 National Health Interview Surveys. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001 Nov 21;93(22):1704–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jnci/93.22.1704. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Cervical cancer statistics. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2012.
    1. Coughlin SS, Uhler RJ. Breast and cervical cancer screening practices among His-panic women in the United States and Puerto Rico, 1998–1999. Prev Med. 2002 Feb;34(2):242–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/pmed.2001.0984. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types