Race/ethnicity and the socioeconomic status gradient in women's cancer screening utilization: a case of diminishing returns?
- PMID: 24509030
- PMCID: PMC4120891
- DOI: 10.1353/hpu.2014.0050
Race/ethnicity and the socioeconomic status gradient in women's cancer screening utilization: a case of diminishing returns?
Abstract
Using three years (2006, 2008, 2010) of nationally representative data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, I assessed the socioeconomic status (SES) gradient for odds of receiving a mammogram in the past two years and a Pap test in the past three years among White, Black, Hispanic, and Asian women living in the U.S. Mammogram and Pap test utilization were less likely among low-SES women. However, women of color experience less benefit than Whites from increasing SES for both screenings; as income and education increased, White women experienced more pronounced increases in the likelihood of being screened than did women of color. In what might be referred to as paradoxical returns, Asian women actually experienced a decline in the likelihood of obtaining a recent Pap test at higher levels of education. My findings suggest that women of color differ from Whites in the extent to which increasing socioeconomic resources is associated with increasing cancer screening utilization.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Breast and cervical cancer screening among women in metropolitan areas of the United States by county-level commuting time to work and use of public transportation, 2004 and 2006.BMC Public Health. 2010 Mar 19;10:146. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-146. BMC Public Health. 2010. PMID: 20302614 Free PMC article.
-
Mammography screening by race/ethnicity among U.S. servicewomen, 2009-2010.Mil Med. 2012 Dec;177(12):1513-8. doi: 10.7205/milmed-d-12-00247. Mil Med. 2012. PMID: 23397698 Free PMC article.
-
Examining Mammography Use by Breast Cancer Risk, Race, Nativity, and Socioeconomic Status.J Immigr Minor Health. 2018 Feb;20(1):59-65. doi: 10.1007/s10903-016-0502-3. J Immigr Minor Health. 2018. PMID: 27662888
-
Factors Associated with Self-Reported Cervical Cancer Screening Among Women Aged 18 Years and Older in the United States.J Community Health. 2017 Feb;42(1):72-77. doi: 10.1007/s10900-016-0231-5. J Community Health. 2017. PMID: 27496176
-
State-specific prevalence of selected chronic disease-related characteristics--Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2001.MMWR Surveill Summ. 2003 Aug 22;52(8):1-80. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2003. PMID: 14532868
Cited by
-
Metaplastic Breast Carcinoma in U.S. Population: Racial Disparities, Survival Benefit of Adjuvant Chemoradiation and Future Personalized Treatment with Genomic Landscape.Cancers (Basel). 2023 May 28;15(11):2954. doi: 10.3390/cancers15112954. Cancers (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37296916 Free PMC article.
-
The role of area-level socioeconomic disadvantage in racial disparities in cancer incidence in metropolitan Detroit.Cancer Med. 2023 Jul;12(13):14623-14635. doi: 10.1002/cam4.6065. Epub 2023 May 15. Cancer Med. 2023. PMID: 37184135 Free PMC article.
-
Literacy and self-rated health: Analysis of the Longitudinal and International Study of Adults (LISA).SSM Popul Health. 2022 Feb 10;17:101038. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2022.101038. eCollection 2022 Mar. SSM Popul Health. 2022. PMID: 35284617 Free PMC article.
-
Socioeconomic Status and Access to Healthcare: Interrelated Drivers for Healthy Aging.Front Public Health. 2020 Jun 18;8:231. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00231. eCollection 2020. Front Public Health. 2020. PMID: 32626678 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Associations between sexual habits, menstrual hygiene practices, demographics and the vaginal microbiome as revealed by Bayesian network analysis.PLoS One. 2018 Jan 24;13(1):e0191625. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191625. eCollection 2018. PLoS One. 2018. PMID: 29364944 Free PMC article.
References
-
- American Cancer Society. Cancer facts & figures 2011. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society; 2011.
-
- Hendrick RE, Helvie MA. United States Preventive Screening Task Force screening mammography recommendations: science ignored. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Feb;196(2):W112–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.2214/AJR.10.5609. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Breen N, Wagener DK, Brown ML, et al. Progress in cancer screening over a decade: results of cancer screening from the 1987, 1992, and 1998 National Health Interview Surveys. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001 Nov 21;93(22):1704–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jnci/93.22.1704. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Cervical cancer statistics. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2012.
-
- Coughlin SS, Uhler RJ. Breast and cervical cancer screening practices among His-panic women in the United States and Puerto Rico, 1998–1999. Prev Med. 2002 Feb;34(2):242–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/pmed.2001.0984. - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous