Support for contextual control in primary care: a qualitative analysis
- PMID: 24551420
- PMCID: PMC3900158
Support for contextual control in primary care: a qualitative analysis
Abstract
Providing support for high-level cognitive performance is largely missing in many decision support designs. Most development in this area is structured to minimize attention, decrease the need for deeper processing and limit intense goal-directed cognitive processing. However, from a dual process perspective, both automatic and deliberative processes need to be supported. The purpose of this qualitative analysis is to explore complex cognitive processing. We used the Contextual Control Model to guide the analysis. Transcripts from 33 taped primary care visits across 4 locations in the VA were analyzed using iterative process of construct and thematic development. Five themes related to high-level cognitive processes were identified: 1) Joint Exchange and Patient Activation; 2) Planning and Proactive Problem Solving; 3) Script and heuristic processing; 4) Time perspectives and 5) Uncertainty management. Results are discussed in terms of the need to support integrated views for complex situation mental models.
Similar articles
-
A qualitative evaluation of the crucial attributes of contextual information necessary in EHR design to support patient-centered medical home care.BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2015 Apr 16;15:30. doi: 10.1186/s12911-015-0150-x. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2015. PMID: 25881181 Free PMC article.
-
Primary care and communication in shared cancer care: a qualitative study.Am J Manag Care. 2011 Apr;17(4):259-65. Am J Manag Care. 2011. PMID: 21615196 Free PMC article.
-
Interdisciplinary Team Perspectives on Mental Health Care in VA Home-Based Primary Care: A Qualitative Study.Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2019 Feb;27(2):128-137. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2018.10.006. Epub 2018 Nov 2. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2019. PMID: 30424995
-
Avoiding and identifying errors in health technology assessment models: qualitative study and methodological review.Health Technol Assess. 2010 May;14(25):iii-iv, ix-xii, 1-107. doi: 10.3310/hta14250. Health Technol Assess. 2010. PMID: 20501062 Review.
-
Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2003 Nov-Dec;6(6):569-720. doi: 10.1080/10937400390208608. J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2003. PMID: 14698953 Review.
References
-
- Chaudhry B, Wang J, Wu S, et al. Systematic review: impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and costs of medical care. Ann Intern Med. 2006 May 16;144(10):742–752. - PubMed
-
- Garg AX, Adhikari NK, McDonald H, et al. Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. Jama. 2005 Mar 9;293(10):1223–1238. - PubMed
-
- Han YY, Carcillo JA, Venkataraman ST, et al. Unexpected increased mortality after implementation of a commercially sold computerized physician order entry system. Pediatrics. 2005 Dec;116(6):1506–1512. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources