Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 May 1;25(5):1132-9.
doi: 10.1177/0956797614523297. Epub 2014 Feb 25.

Inferring character from faces: a developmental study

Affiliations

Inferring character from faces: a developmental study

Emily J Cogsdill et al. Psychol Sci. .

Abstract

Human adults attribute character traits to faces readily and with high consensus. In two experiments investigating the development of face-to-trait inference, adults and children ages 3 through 10 attributed trustworthiness, dominance, and competence to pairs of faces. In Experiment 1, the attributions of 3- to 4-year-olds converged with those of adults, and 5- to 6-year-olds' attributions were at adult levels of consistency. Children ages 3 and above consistently attributed the basic mean/nice evaluation not only to faces varying in trustworthiness (Experiment 1) but also to faces varying in dominance and competence (Experiment 2). This research suggests that the predisposition to judge others using scant facial information appears in adultlike forms early in childhood and does not require prolonged social experience.

Keywords: cognitive development; open data; open materials; physical appearance; social cognition; social perception.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Sample stimuli from Experiment 1.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Average rates of attributing “nice” to trustworthy and “mean” to untrustworthy faces. Error bars represent SEM.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Average rates of attributing “strong” to dominant and “not very strong” to submissive faces.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Average rates of attributing “smart” to competent and “not very smart” to incompetent faces.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Average rates of attributing “nice” to submissive and “mean” to dominant faces (Experiment 2).
Figure 6
Figure 6
Average rates of attributing “nice” to competent and “mean” to incompetent faces.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Antonakis J, Dalgas O. Predicting Elections: Child’s Play! Science. 2009;323:1183. - PubMed
    1. Barenboim C. The development of person perception in childhood and adolescence: From behavioral comparisons to psychological constructs to psychological comparisons. Child Development. 1981;52:129–244. doi: 10.2307/1129222. - DOI
    1. Bar-Haim Y, Ziv T, Lamy D, Hodes RM. Nature and nurture in own-race face processing. Psychological Science. 2006;17(2):159–63. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01679.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Blair IV, Judd CM, Chapleau KM. The influence of Afrocentric facial features in criminal sentencing. Psychological Science. 2004;15:674–679. doi: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00739.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Carré JM, McCormick CM, Mondloch CJ. Facial structure is a reliable cue of aggressive behavior. Psychological Science. 2009;20(10):1194–1198. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02423.x. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources