Protective benefits of a stabilised stannous-containing fluoride dentifrice against erosive acid damage

Int Dent J. 2014 Mar;64 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):29-34. doi: 10.1111/idj.12100.

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the potential of a stabilised stannous (Sn)-containing NaF dentifrice (Oral B/blend-a-Med(®) Pro-Expert), in addition to a number of other marketed European dentifrices formulated with various fluoride actives and two control dentifrices, to protect enamel against erosive acid damage.

Methods: Cores of human enamel (four per group) were soaked in pooled human saliva, and then treated with a 1:3 slurry (dentifrice:saliva) using a standardised in vitro erosion model (5-day cycling) that includes 10-minute challenges with 1% citric acid applied 60 minutes after each dentifrice treatment. Enamel surface loss was measured using transverse microradiography (TMR).

Results: Specimens treated with the Sn-containing NaF dentifrice showed 6.5 μm of surface loss ± 1.2 (SEM), which was not significantly different (P < 0.05, Fisher LSD) from that of a clinically proven, stabilised SnF2 positive control [Crest(®) Pro-Health, 1,100 ppm F as SnF2 : 3.0 μm of surface loss ± 1.1 (SEM)]. The Sn-containing NaF dentifrice and the clinically proven positive control both provided significantly greater protection (P < 0.05, Fisher LSD) compared with all of the other products tested. Enamel loss (SEM) values for other European products and the reference control (active agents) were: Meridol(®) : (1,400 ppm F as AmF + SnF2 ) 12.0 μm (1.47); Colgate(®) Cavity Protection: (1,450 ppm F as SMFP + NaF) 12.9 μm (1.66); Odol med 3(®) (1,400 ppm F as NaF) 14.2 μm (1.49); Elmex(®) (1,400 ppm F as AmF) 14.5 μm (1.76); Colgate(®) Enamel Protect: (1,450 ppm F as NaF + KNO3 ) 16.3 μm (2.02); Lacalut(®) aktiv: (1,400 ppm F as AlF3 ) 18.5 μm (1.71); Sensodyne(®) ProNamel(™) : (1,450 ppm F as NaF + KNO3 ) 20.5 μm (1.26); Crest Cavity Protection (1,100 ppm F as NaF, reference control) 22.00 μm (2.04); and Mentadent(®) : (1,450 ppm F as NaF + Zn citrate) 22.3 μm (0.63).

Conclusion: These results support the potential for the stabilised, Sn-containing NaF dentifrice to provide erosion protection benefits that are not significantly different from the positive control benchmark for erosion protection (stabilised SnF2 ), and are significantly better than a broad range of dentifrice formulations available on the European market.

Keywords: Erosion; Sn-containing; dentifrice; fluoride; stannous.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Amines / therapeutic use
  • Citric Acid / adverse effects
  • Dental Enamel / drug effects
  • Dental Enamel / ultrastructure
  • Dentifrices / therapeutic use*
  • Diamines / therapeutic use
  • Drug Combinations
  • Fluorides / therapeutic use
  • Humans
  • Hydrogen Peroxide / therapeutic use
  • Image Processing, Computer-Assisted / methods
  • Microradiography / methods
  • Nitrates / therapeutic use
  • Phosphates / therapeutic use
  • Protective Agents / therapeutic use
  • Saliva / physiology
  • Silicic Acid / therapeutic use
  • Sodium Bicarbonate / therapeutic use
  • Sodium Fluoride / therapeutic use
  • Time Factors
  • Tin Fluorides / therapeutic use*
  • Tooth Erosion / pathology
  • Tooth Erosion / prevention & control*
  • Toothpastes / therapeutic use

Substances

  • Amines
  • Crest Pro-Health Dentifrice
  • Dentifrices
  • Diamines
  • Drug Combinations
  • Mentadent Dentifrice
  • Nitrates
  • Phosphates
  • Protective Agents
  • Sensodyne
  • Tin Fluorides
  • Toothpastes
  • hydrated silica gel-based toothpaste
  • Meridol
  • Silicic Acid
  • Citric Acid
  • Sodium Bicarbonate
  • Olaflur
  • Sodium Fluoride
  • Hydrogen Peroxide
  • Fluorides