Economic implications of recent trends in U.S. immediate autologous breast reconstruction
- PMID: 24572839
- DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000039
Economic implications of recent trends in U.S. immediate autologous breast reconstruction
Abstract
Background: Recent trends in U.S. breast oncology and autologous reconstruction, such as greater use of contralateral prophylactic mastectomies and microsurgery, may have increased reconstructive complication rates and costs. Simultaneously, with the increased complexity of autologous reconstruction in the setting of declining reimbursement, there may be market concentration of these procedures to specialized high-volume centers. This study aimed to (1) measure cost of autologous reconstruction in the setting of microsurgical technique, contralateral prophylactic mastectomies, and high-volume centers; and (2) analyze trends in market share of these procedures.
Methods: Inflation-adjusted hospital charges were analyzed for autologous procedures using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database (1998 to 2010), including a subgroup of microsurgical cases. Median charges were adjusted by patient case mix and analyzed by outcome, procedure type, and hospital volume using the Mann-Whitney test. Market share was evaluated through examination of trends in hospitals performing autologous reconstruction and procedures at high-volume centers.
Results: Median charges for 21,016 autologous reconstructions were $22,198. Costs were higher for bilateral reconstruction ($34,202) and microsurgical cases ($57,449). Hospital charges increased from $20,315 (no complications) to $42,210 when both surgery-specific and systemic complications were present (p < 0.01). High-volume hospitals reduced charges by 7.5 percent and had lower costs in the setting of complications (p < 0.01). The number of hospitals performing autologous reconstructions decreased 35 percent, with increasing annual procedures in high-volume centers (48.3 to 73.3, p < 0.01).
Conclusions: Bilateral reconstructions and microsurgical technique are associated with greater health care costs. The market concentration of autologous reconstruction to high-volume centers is associated with reduced charges. The long-term implications of this trend are unknown.
Similar articles
-
A nationwide analysis of the relationship between hospital volume and outcome for autologous breast reconstruction.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Aug;132(2):192e-200e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31829586c1. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013. PMID: 23897346
-
The influence of sociodemographic factors and hospital characteristics on the method of breast reconstruction, including microsurgery: a U.S. population-based study.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012 May;129(5):1071-1079. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31824a29c5. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012. PMID: 22544091
-
A paradigm shift in U.S. breast reconstruction: Part 2. The influence of changing mastectomy patterns on reconstructive rate and method.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Mar;131(3):320e-326e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31827cf576. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013. PMID: 23446580
-
Trends and concepts in post-mastectomy breast reconstruction.J Surg Oncol. 2016 Jun;113(8):891-4. doi: 10.1002/jso.24201. Epub 2016 Feb 14. J Surg Oncol. 2016. PMID: 26876921 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Current Trends in Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Nov;140(5S Advances in Breast Reconstruction):7S-13S. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003941. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017. PMID: 29064917 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Racial Disparities in Breast Reconstruction at a Comprehensive Cancer Center.J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2022 Dec;9(6):2323-2333. doi: 10.1007/s40615-021-01169-3. Epub 2021 Oct 13. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2022. PMID: 34647274
-
Factors Associated With State-Specific Medicaid Expansion and Receipt of Autologous Breast Reconstruction Among Patients Undergoing Mastectomy.JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Aug 2;4(8):e2119141. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.19141. JAMA Netw Open. 2021. PMID: 34342650 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of Physician Payments on Microvascular Breast Reconstruction: An All-Payer Claim Database Analysis.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020 Feb;145(2):333-339. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000006453. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020. PMID: 31985616 Free PMC article.
-
Elective Revisions after Breast Reconstruction: Results from the Mastectomy Reconstruction Outcomes Consortium.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019 Dec;144(6):1280-1290. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000006225. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019. PMID: 31764633 Free PMC article.
-
The Influence of Physician Payments on the Method of Breast Reconstruction: A National Claims Analysis.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018 Oct;142(4):434e-442e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004727. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018. PMID: 29979366 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Cemal Y, Albornoz CR, Disa JJ, et al. A paradigm shift in U.S. breast reconstruction: Part 2. The influence of changing mastectomy patterns on reconstructive rate and method. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;131:320e–326e
-
- Tuttle TM, Habermann EB, Grund EH, et al. Increasing use of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy for breast cancer patients: A trend toward more aggressive surgical treatment. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:5203–5209
-
- Tuttle TM, Jarosek S, Habermann EB, et al. Increasing rates of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy among patients with ductal carcinoma in situ. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:1362–1367
-
- Fischer JP, Sieber B, Nelson JA, et al. Comprehensive outcome and cost analysis of free tissue transfer for breast reconstruction: An experience with 1303 flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;131:195–203
-
- Alderman AK, Atisha D, Streu R, et al. Patterns and correlates of postmastectomy breast reconstruction by U.S. plastic surgeons: Results from a national survey. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127:1796–1803
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
