Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2014 Feb 26:348:g1247.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.g1247.

Role of quality measurement in inappropriate use of screening for colorectal cancer: retrospective cohort study

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Role of quality measurement in inappropriate use of screening for colorectal cancer: retrospective cohort study

Sameer D Saini et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objective: To examine whether the age based quality measure for screening for colorectal cancer is associated with overuse of screening in patients aged 70-75 in poor health and underuse in those aged over age 75 in good health.

Design: Retrospective cohort study utilizing electronic data from the Veterans Affairs (VA) Health Care System, the largest integrated healthcare system in the United States.

Setting: VA Health Care System.

Participants: Veterans aged ≥ 50 due for repeat average risk colorectal cancer screening at a primary care visit in fiscal year 2010.

Main outcome measures: Completion of colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy, or fecal occult blood testing within 24 months of the 2010 visit.

Results: 399,067 veterans met inclusion/exclusion criteria (mean age 67, 97% men). Of these, 38% had electronically documented screening within 24 months. In multivariable log binomial regression adjusted for Charlson comorbidity index, sex, and number of primary care visits, screening decreased markedly after the age of 75 (the age cut off used by the quality measure) (adjusted relative risk 0.35, 95% confidence interval 0.30 to 0.40). A veteran who was aged 75 and unhealthy (in whom life expectancy might be limited and screening more likely to result in net burden or harm) was significantly more likely to undergo screening than a veteran aged 76 and healthy (unadjusted relative risk 1.64, 1.36 to 1.97).

Conclusions: Specification of a quality measure can have important implications for clinical care. Future quality measures should focus on individual risk/benefit to ensure that patients who are likely to benefit from a service receive it (regardless of age), and that those who are likely to incur harm are spared unnecessary and costly care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf and declare: SDS had financial support from the Department of Veterans Affairs for the submitted work; no financial relationships with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous three years; no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Figures

None
Fig 1 Relation between age, health status, and screening (n=399 067). In a 75 year old man, Charlson index of 0 indicates life expectancy >10 years, Charlson index of 1-3 indicates life expectancy of 5-10 years, and Charlson index ≥4 indicates life expectancy <5 years
None
Fig 2 Screening at age 75 v age 76 (n=21 499)
None
Fig 3 Screening by age (n=399 067) adjusted for sex, Charlson comorbidity index, and number of primary care visits in 2010

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Screening for colorectal cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 2008;149:627-37. - PubMed
    1. NHS Information Centre. Extension of NHS bowel cancer screening programme to men and women aged up to 75. Secondary extension of NHS bowel cancer screening programme to men and women aged up to 75. https://mqi.ic.nhs.uk/IndicatorDefaultView.aspx?ref=1.05.08.
    1. Kerr EA, Fleming B. Making performance indicators work: experiences of US Veterans Health Administration. BMJ 2007;335:971-3. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Walter LC, Covinsky KE. Cancer screening in elderly patients: a framework for individualized decision making. JAMA 2001;285:2750-6. - PubMed
    1. Qaseem A, Denberg TD, Hopkins RH Jr, Humphrey LL, Levine J, Sweet DE, et al. Screening for colorectal cancer: a guidance statement from the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med 2012;156:378-86. - PubMed

Publication types