Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jul;43(4):496-502.
doi: 10.1093/ageing/afu021. Epub 2014 Mar 2.

Validation of the 4AT, a New Instrument for Rapid Delirium Screening: A Study in 234 Hospitalised Older People

Free PMC article

Validation of the 4AT, a New Instrument for Rapid Delirium Screening: A Study in 234 Hospitalised Older People

Giuseppe Bellelli et al. Age Ageing. .
Free PMC article

Erratum in


Objective: to evaluate the performance of the 4 'A's Test (4AT) in screening for delirium in older patients. The 4AT is a new test for rapid screening of delirium in routine clinical practice.

Design: : prospective study of consecutively admitted elderly patients with independent 4AT and reference standard assessments.

Setting: : an acute geriatrics ward and a department of rehabilitation.

Participants: two hundred and thirty-six patients (aged ≥70 years) consecutively admitted over a period of 4 months.

Measurements: in each centre, the 4AT was administered by a geriatrician to eligible patients within 24 h of admission. Reference standard delirium diagnosis (DSM-IV-TR criteria) was obtained within 30 min by a different geriatrician who was blind to the 4AT score. The presence of dementia was assessed using the Alzheimer's Questionnaire and the informant section of the Clinical Dementia Rating scale. The main outcome measure was the accuracy of the 4AT in diagnosing delirium.

Results: patients were 83.9 ± 6.1 years old, and the majority were women (64%). Delirium was detected in 12.3% (n = 29), dementia in 31.2% (n = 74) and a combination of both in 7.2% (n = 17). The 4AT had a sensitivity of 89.7% and specificity 84.1% for delirium. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves for delirium diagnosis were 0.93 in the whole population, 0.92 in patients without dementia and 0.89 in patients with dementia.

Conclusions: the 4AT is a sensitive and specific method of screening for delirium in hospitalised older people. Its brevity and simplicity support its use in routine clinical practice.

Keywords: cognitive impairment; delirium; delirium detection; dementia; diagnostic accuracy; geriatrics; older people; screening; validation.


Figure 1.
Figure 1.
ROC comparison curve for the 4AT versus the diagnosis of delirium (DSM IV-TR criteria) in the whole population and in subgroups of patients with and without dementia.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 68 articles

See all "Cited by" articles


    1. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 4th edn. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2000.
    1. Siddiqi N, House AO, Holmes JD. Occurrence and outcome of delirium in medical in-patients: a systematic literature review. Age Ageing. 2006;35:350–64. - PubMed
    1. Witlox J, Eurelings LSM, de Jonghe JFM. Delirium in elderly patients and the risk of postdischarge mortality, institutionalization, and dementia: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2010;304:443–51. - PubMed
    1. Bellelli G, Magnifico F, Trabucchi M. Outcomes at 12 months in a population of elderly patients discharged from a rehabilitation unit. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2008;9:55–64. - PubMed
    1. Partridge JS, Martin FC, Harari D, Dhesi JK. The delirium experience: what is the effect on patients, relatives and staff and what can be done to modify this? Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2012 doi: 10.1002/gps.3900. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types