Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
, 25 (3), 454-61

Obesity Paradox: Conditioning on Disease Enhances Biases in Estimating the Mortality Risks of Obesity

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Obesity Paradox: Conditioning on Disease Enhances Biases in Estimating the Mortality Risks of Obesity

Samuel H Preston et al. Epidemiology.

Abstract

Background: Many studies have documented an obesity paradox-a survival advantage of being obese-in populations diagnosed with a medical condition. Whether obesity is causally associated with improved mortality in these conditions is unresolved.

Methods: We develop the logic of collider bias as it pertains to the association between smoking and obesity in a diseased population. Data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) are used to investigate this bias empirically among persons with diabetes and prediabetes (dysglycemia). We also use NHANES to investigate whether reverse causal pathways are more prominent among people with dysglycemia than in the source population. Cox regression analysis is used to examine the extent of the obesity paradox among those with dysglycemia. In the regression analysis, we explore interactions between obesity and smoking, and we implement a variety of data restrictions designed to reduce the extent of reverse causality.

Results: We find an obesity paradox among persons with dysglycemia. In this population, the inverse association between obesity and smoking is much stronger than in the source population, and the extent of illness and weight loss is greater. The obesity paradox is absent among never-smokers. Among smokers, the paradox is eliminated through successive efforts to reduce the extent of reverse causality.

Conclusion: Higher mortality among normal-weight people with dysglycemia is not causal but is rather a product of the closer inverse association between obesity and smoking in this subpopulation.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1.
FIGURE 1.
Illustration of how the joint distribution of smoking and obesity changes on selection into the state of diabetes.
FIGURE 2.
FIGURE 2.
Directed acyclic graph representing the causal effects of body mass index on mortality.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 43 articles

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Carnethon MR, De Chavez PJ, Biggs ML, et al. Association of weight status with mortality in adults with incident diabetes. JAMA. 2012;308:581–590. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Doehner W, Erdmann E, Cairns R, et al. Inverse relation of body weight and weight change with mortality and morbidity in patients with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular co-morbidity: an analysis of the PROactive study population. Int J Cardiol. 2012;162:20–26. - PubMed
    1. Jackson CL, Yeh HC, Szklo M, et al. Body-mass index and all-cause mortality in US adults with and without diabetes. J Gen Intern Med. 2014;29:25–33. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Romero-Corral A, Montori VM, Somers VK, et al. Association of bodyweight with total mortality and with cardiovascular events in coronary artery disease: a systematic review of cohort studies. Lancet. 2006;368:666–678. - PubMed
    1. Lavie CJ, Milani RV, Ventura HO. Obesity and cardiovascular disease: risk factor, paradox, and impact of weight loss. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53:1925–1932. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Feedback