Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014 May;25(3):186-90.
doi: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000046.

Age-related Eye Disease Study 2: perspectives, recommendations, and unanswered questions

Affiliations
Review

Age-related Eye Disease Study 2: perspectives, recommendations, and unanswered questions

Mary E Aronow et al. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2014 May.

Abstract

Purpose of review: This review provides a perspective on the Age-related Eye Disease Study 2 (AREDS2) including a summary of the goals and rationale of the study, major findings, subsequent management recommendations, and questions that remain to be answered.

Recent findings: The primary goal of the AREDS2 was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of lutein plus zeaxanthin and/or omega-3 long-chain polyunsaturated acid supplementation in reducing the risk of developing advanced age-related macular degeneration (AMD). AREDS2 also investigated the effects of omitting β-carotene and reducing the concentration of zinc from the original AREDS formulation. Although primary analysis from the AREDS2 did not reveal a benefit of daily supplementation with lutein/zeaxanthin on AMD progression, secondary exploratory analyses suggested that lutein/zeaxanthin were helpful in reducing this risk. Comparison of low-dose to higher-dose zinc showed no significant benefit.

Summary: The overall evidence on the beneficial and adverse effects from AREDS2 and other studies suggests that lutein/zeaxanthin could be more appropriate than β-carotene in AREDS-type supplements. Questions remain regarding the AREDS2 study results such as: whether the findings are generalizable to the population as a whole, what is the long-term safety profile of lutein/zeaxanthin supplementation, should other carotenoids be included in AREDS-type supplements, and at what optimal doses?

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Congdon N, O’Colmain B, Klaver CC, Klein R, Munoz B, Friedman DS, et al. Causes and prevalence of visual impairment among adults in the United States. Archives of ophthalmology. 2004;122(4):477–85. Epub 2004/04/14. - PubMed
    1. Klaver CC, Wolfs RC, Vingerling JR, Hofman A, de Jong PT. Age-specific prevalence and causes of blindness and visual impairment in an older population: the Rotterdam Study. Archives of ophthalmology. 1998;116(5):653–8. Epub 1998/05/22. - PubMed
    1. Pizzarello L, Abiose A, Ffytche T, Duerksen R, Thulasiraj R, Taylor H, et al. VISION 2020: The Right to Sight: a global initiative to eliminate avoidable blindness. Archives of ophthalmology. 2004;122(4):615–20. Epub 2004/04/14. - PubMed
    1. Brown DM, Kaiser PK, Michels M, Soubrane G, Heier JS, Kim RY, et al. Ranibizumab versus verteporfin for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. The New England journal of medicine. 2006;355(14):1432–44. Epub 2006/10/06. - PubMed
    1. Meleth AD, Wong WT, Chew EY. Treatment for atrophic macular degeneration. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2011;22(3):190–3. Epub 2011/03/24. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms