Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2014 Mar;62(3):454-61.
doi: 10.1111/jgs.12711. Epub 2014 Mar 11.

The effects of public reporting on physical restraints and antipsychotic use in nursing home residents with severe cognitive impairment

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

The effects of public reporting on physical restraints and antipsychotic use in nursing home residents with severe cognitive impairment

R Tamara Konetzka et al. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2014 Mar.

Abstract

Objectives: To assess whether reductions in physical restraint use associated with quality reporting may have had the unintended consequence of increasing antipsychotic use in nursing home (NH) residents with severe cognitive impairment.

Design: Retrospective analysis of NH clinical assessment data from 1999 to 2008 comparing NHs subject to public reporting of physical restraints with nonreporting NHs.

Setting: Medicare- and Medicaid-certified NHs in the United States.

Participants: Observations (N = 3.9 million) on 809,645 residents with severe cognitive impairment in 4,258 NHs in six states.

Intervention: Public reporting of physical restraint use rates.

Measurements: Use of physical restraints and antipsychotic medications.

Results: Physical restraint use declined significantly from 1999 to 2008 in NH residents with severe cognitive impairment. The decline was larger in NHs that were subject to reporting of restraints than in those that were not (-8.3 vs -3.3 percentage points, P < .001). Correspondingly, antipsychotic use in the same residents increased more in NHs that were subject to public reporting (4.5 vs 2.9 percentage points, P < .001). Approximately 36% of the increase in antipsychotic use may be attributable to public reporting of physical restraints.

Conclusion: This analysis suggests that public reporting of physical restraint use had the unintended consequence of increasing use of antipsychotics in NH residents with severe cognitive impairment.

Keywords: antipsychotics; nursing homes; public reporting; quality; restraints.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
(A) Physical restraint and (B) Antipsychotic use in nursing homes according to cognitive impairment, 1999–2008. Sample comprises 23,377,681 resident-level observations from 4,272 nursing homes in California, Florida, Illinois, New York, Ohio, and Texas that were subject to public reporting of physical restraints.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Physical restraints and antipsychotic use in nursing home residents with severe cognitive impairment, 1999–2008. Sample comprises 3,889 ,781 resident-level observations from 4,258 nursing homes in California, Florida, Illinois, New York, Ohio, and Texas that were subject to public reporting of physical restraints.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Trends in physical restraint and antipsychotic use in nursing home (NH) residents with severe cognitive impairment according to NH staffing level: 1999–2008. Sample comprises 3,889,781 resident-level observations from 4,258 NHs in California, Florida, Illinois, New York, Ohio, and Texas subject to public reporting of physical restraints. Staffing is classified as low if total nurse hours per resident-day is at or equal to the median of 3.19 and as high if greater than the median.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Freedom from Unnecessary Physical Restraints: Two Decades of National Progress in Nursing Home Care Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2008.
    1. Institute of Medicine Committee on Nursing Home Regulation. Improving the Quality of Care in Nursing Homes Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1986.
    1. Nursing Home Compare. 2002. [on-line]. Available at http://www.medicare.gov/Nhcompare/Home.asp Accessed April 21, 2005.
    1. Feng ZL, Hirdes JP, Smith TF et al. Use of physical restraints and antipsychotic medications in nursing homes: A cross-national study. Int J Geriatr Psych 2009;24:1110–1118. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Spore DL, Horgas AL, Smyer MA et al. The relationship of antipsychotic drug use, behavior, and diagnoses among nursing home residents. J Aging Health 1992;4:514–535. - PubMed

Publication types

Substances