Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Mar 11;9(3):e91399.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0091399. eCollection 2014.

Impact of the 2009 US Preventive Services Task Force guidelines on screening mammography rates on women in their 40s

Affiliations

Impact of the 2009 US Preventive Services Task Force guidelines on screening mammography rates on women in their 40s

Amy T Wang et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: The 2009 US Preventive Services Task Force breast cancer screening update recommended against routine screening mammography for women aged 40-49; confusion and release of conflicting guidelines followed. We examined the impact of the USPSTF update on population-level screening mammography rates in women ages 40-49.

Methods and findings: We conducted a retrospective, interrupted time-series analysis using a nationally representative, privately-insured population from 1/1/2006-12/31/2011. Women ages 40-64 enrolled for ≥ 1 month were included. The primary outcome was receipt of screening mammography, identified using administrative claims-based algorithms. Time-series regression models were estimated to determine the effect of the guideline change on screening mammography rates. 5.5 million women ages 40-64 were included. A 1.8 per 1,000 women (p = 0.003) decrease in monthly screening mammography rates for 40-49 year-old women was observed two months following the guideline change; no initial effect was seen for 50-64 year-old women. However, two years following the guideline change, a slight increase in screening mammography rates above expected was observed in both age groups.

Conclusions: We detected a modest initial drop in screening mammography rates in women ages 40-49 immediately after the 2009 USPSTF guideline followed by an increase in screening rates. Unfavorable public reactions and release of conflicting statements may have tempered the initial impact. Renewal of the screening debate may have brought mammography to the forefront of women's minds, contributing to the observed increase in mammography rates two years after the guideline change. This pattern is unlikely to reflect informed choice and underscores the need for improved translation of evidence-based care and guidelines into practice.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Screening algorithm used to identify screening mammograms.
ICD-9, International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision; CPT, Current Procedural Terminology.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Screening mammography rates before and after the US Preventive Services Task Force guideline change.
The solid lines represent the observed screening mammography rates in women ages 40–49 and 50–64 before and after the change in breast cancer screening guidelines by the US Preventive Services Task Force in November 2009. The dotted lines represent the modeled expected screening mammography rates in the respective age groups after the guideline change.USPSTF, United States Preventive Services Task Force.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. US Preventive Services Task Force (2009) Screening for breast cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Annals of internal medicine 151: 716–726, W-236. - PubMed
    1. Amercian Cancer Society (2009) Press Release: American Cancer Society Responds to Changes To USPSTF Mammography Guidelines. Available: http://pressroom.cancer.org/index.php?s=43&item=201. Accessed 2013 Jan 28.
    1. IMS Health (2012) IMS RxBenchmark| PharMetrics Integrated Database. Available: http://www.imshealth.com/portal/site/ims/menuitem.d248e29c86589c9c30e81c.... Accessed 2012 Sept 12.
    1. Stempel DA, Mauskopf J, McLaughlin T, Yazdani C, Stanford RH (2001) Comparison of asthma costs in patients starting fluticasone propionate compared to patients starting montelukast. Respiratory medicine 95: 227–234. - PubMed
    1. Fenton JJ, Zhu W, Balch S, Smith-Bindman R, Fishman P, et al... (2012) Distinguishing Screening From Diagnostic Mammograms Using Medicare Claims Data. Medical care. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Grants and funding

This work was supported by the Small Grants Program sponsored by the Division of General Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.