The seizure, not electricity, is essential in convulsive therapy: the flurothyl experience

J ECT. 2014 Jun;30(2):91-3. doi: 10.1097/YCT.0000000000000110.


Background: For more than 50 years, research in convulsive therapy has been focused on the impact of electricity and seizures on memory and not on brain chemistry or neurophysiology. Brief pulse and ultra-brief pulse currents replaced sinusoidal currents. Electrode placements were varied, energy dosing was altered, and electricity was replaced by magnetic currents.

Method: The published experiences and archival records of seizures induced by camphor, pentylenetetrazol, and flurothyl are reviewed and compared with the changes induced by electricity.

Findings: The clinical efficacy of chemically induced seizures is equal to that of electrical inductions. Seizure durations are longer, and impairment of cognition and memory is less. Electroconvulsive therapy replaced chemical treatments for ease of use, not for greater efficacy or safety.

Conclusions: The brain seizure, not the method of induction, is the essential element in the efficacy of convulsive therapy. Seizure induction with chemicals avoids the direct effects of electricity on brain functions with lesser effects on cognition. Reexamination of chemical inductions of seizures as replacements for electricity is encouraged.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Convulsants / therapeutic use*
  • Convulsive Therapy / adverse effects
  • Convulsive Therapy / methods*
  • Electroconvulsive Therapy*
  • Flurothyl / therapeutic use*
  • Humans
  • Mental Disorders / therapy*
  • Seizures / etiology*


  • Convulsants
  • Flurothyl