Ivacaftor for the treatment of patients with cystic fibrosis and the G551D mutation: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis
- PMID: 24656117
- PMCID: PMC4780965
- DOI: 10.3310/hta18180
Ivacaftor for the treatment of patients with cystic fibrosis and the G551D mutation: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis
Abstract
Background: Ivacaftor (Kalydeco(®), Vertex Pharmaceuticals) is the first of a new class of drugs that target the underlying protein defect in cystic fibrosis (CF). It is aimed at patients with the G551D (glycine to aspartate change in nucleotide 1784 in exon 11) mutation; 5.7% of patients with CF in the UK have this mutation.
Objectives: To review the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of ivacaftor for the treatment of CF in patients aged ≥ 6 years who have the G551D mutation.
Methods: Ten databases, including MEDLINE and EMBASE, were searched from inception to July 2012. Studies that evaluated ivacaftor for the treatment of adults and children (≥ 6 years) with at least one G551D mutation were eligible. There were insufficient data to conduct a formal meta-analysis. The manufacturer of ivacaftor, Vertex Pharmaceuticals, submitted a deterministic patient-level simulation model for the assessment of the lifetime cost-effectiveness of ivacaftor. We modified the model where values were not UK-specific or not recent, or where better estimates could be found. The only change to the model structure was the addition of lung transplantations. We changed utility values, annual decline in percentage predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), and the baseline exacerbation rate, and used data from the CF Registry to estimate the relation between costs, age and percentage predicted FEV1. Estimates of treatment effect of ivacaftor came from the clinical effectiveness review. We modelled three scenarios for the longer-term effects of ivacaftor. We also modelled an 'optimistic' scenario for patients aged < 12 years with little lung damage. We conducted a budget impact analysis to estimate the total cost to the NHS of introducing ivacaftor in England.
Results: Three studies were included: a randomised controlled trial (RCT) in adults (n = 167) (≥ 12 years), a RCT in children (n = 26) (6-11 years), and an open-label extension study of the two RCTs. Both RCTs reported significantly greater changes from baseline in all measures of lung function in patients receiving ivacaftor than in those receiving placebo. The mean difference in change in percentage predicted FEV1 was 10.5 [95% confidence interval (CI) 8.5 to 12.5] percentage points in the adults' study and 10.0 (95% CI 4.5 to 15.5) percentage points in the children's study at 48 weeks. Improvements in lung function were seen across all subgroups investigated (age, sex, study region and lung function). There were significantly greater improvements in the ivacaftor group than in the placebo group for all outcomes assessed (exacerbations, quality of life, sweat chloride and weight) with the exception of quality of life in children. Improvements were maintained in the open-label trial. Adverse events were mainly minor and comparable across treatment groups. Both RCTs reported more withdrawals in the placebo group than in the ivacaftor group. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio varied between £335,000 and £1,274,000 per quality-adjusted life-year gained. The total additional lifetime costs for all eligible CF patients in England ranged from £438M to £479M; the lifetime cost for standard care only was £72M.
Conclusions: The available evidence suggests that ivacaftor is a clinically effective treatment for patients with CF and the G551D mutation; the high cost of ivacaftor may prove an obstacle in the uptake of this treatment. The main priority for further research is the long-term effectiveness of ivacaftor.
Study registration: This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42012002516.
Source of funding: The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.
Similar articles
-
Potentiators (specific therapies for class III and IV mutations) for cystic fibrosis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jan 7;1(1):CD009841. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009841.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019. PMID: 30616300 Free PMC article.
-
Potentiators (specific therapies for class III and IV mutations) for cystic fibrosis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Mar 26;(3):CD009841. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009841.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jan 07;1:CD009841. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009841.pub3 PMID: 25811419 Updated. Review.
-
Cost-Effectiveness and Budget Impact of Lumacaftor/Ivacaftor in the Treatment of Cystic Fibrosis.J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2018 Oct;24(10):987-997. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2018.24.10.987. J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2018. PMID: 30247102 Free PMC article.
-
Correctors (specific therapies for class II CFTR mutations) for cystic fibrosis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Aug 2;8(8):CD010966. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010966.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Dec 17;12:CD010966. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010966.pub3 PMID: 30070364 Free PMC article. Updated. Review.
-
Forecasting US ivacaftor outcomes and cost in cystic fibrosis patients with the G551D mutation.Eur Respir J. 2016 Jun;47(6):1697-705. doi: 10.1183/13993003.01444-2015. Epub 2016 Apr 28. Eur Respir J. 2016. PMID: 27126691
Cited by
-
Molecular and functional correction of a deep intronic splicing mutation in CFTR by CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing.Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev. 2023 Oct 18;31:101140. doi: 10.1016/j.omtm.2023.101140. eCollection 2023 Dec 14. Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev. 2023. PMID: 38027060 Free PMC article.
-
Calibration and validation of modeled 5-year survival predictions among people with cystic fibrosis treated with the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator modulator ivacaftor using United States registry data.PLoS One. 2023 Apr 12;18(4):e0283479. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283479. eCollection 2023. PLoS One. 2023. PMID: 37043485 Free PMC article.
-
A model-based economic analysis of the CFHealthHub intervention to support adherence to inhaled medications for people with cystic fibrosis in the UK.Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2023 Jan 17;39(1):e6. doi: 10.1017/S0266462322003373. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2023. PMID: 36647697 Free PMC article.
-
The estimation of health state utility values in rare diseases: do the approaches in submissions for NICE technology appraisals reflect the existing literature? A scoping review.Eur J Health Econ. 2023 Sep;24(7):1151-1216. doi: 10.1007/s10198-022-01541-y. Epub 2022 Nov 5. Eur J Health Econ. 2023. PMID: 36335234 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Plasma and cellular ivacaftor concentrations in patients with cystic fibrosis.Pediatr Pulmonol. 2022 Nov;57(11):2745-2753. doi: 10.1002/ppul.26093. Epub 2022 Aug 17. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2022. PMID: 35927224 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
