Primary care staff perspectives on a virtual learning collaborative to support medical home implementation
- PMID: 24715388
- PMCID: PMC4070246
- DOI: 10.1007/s11606-013-2668-x
Primary care staff perspectives on a virtual learning collaborative to support medical home implementation
Abstract
Background: Many organizations rely on quality improvement collaboratives (QICs) to facilitate Patient-Centered Medical Home (PCMH) implementation, and there is a trend toward conducting QIC activities virtually to reduce costs and expand their reach. However, the evidence base for QICs is limited; questions remain about how QICs operate, why they succeed or fail, and how they are experienced by participants.
Objective: We surveyed participants in an innovative Virtual Collaborative (VC) designed to support PCMH implementation within one Veterans Integrated Service Network, to understand why and for whom the VC was more/less effective and identify opportunities for improvement.
Design: This anonymous online survey was designed to assess participants' views on the VC's usefulness, impact, and acceptability, and to explore variations by role, practice setting, prior training, and overall engagement in VC activities.
Participants: Respondents were 353 primary care staff, including providers, nurses, and support staff.
Measures/approach: The survey comprised 32 structured and three free-response items. Structured items assessed participation in and perceived usefulness of VC activities; perceived acceptability of the training format; overall perceived impact; and basic demographics. Responses were dichotomized and compared using Chi-square tests. Free-response items inviting constructive criticism of the VC were coded and summarized to identify themes and illustrative quotes.
Results: The VC most benefited respondents with prior PCMH training and those who fully participated in VC activities. Respondents especially valued the opportunity to share experiences with other teams. Non-providers and those new to PCMH felt learning content did not meet their needs. Reported barriers to full participation included staffing constraints, insufficient and/or unprotected time, and inadequate leadership support.
Conclusions: Our study offers practical lessons for others considering a virtual collaborative model for PCMH spread. Findings contribute to the evidence base for QICs overall and virtual QICs in particular, highlighting the value of seeking input from "the trenches."
Figures
Similar articles
-
Assessing fidelity to evidence-based quality improvement as an implementation strategy for patient-centered medical home transformation in the Veterans Health Administration.Implement Sci. 2020 Mar 18;15(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s13012-020-0979-y. Implement Sci. 2020. PMID: 32183873 Free PMC article.
-
Teamlet structure and early experiences of medical home implementation for veterans.J Gen Intern Med. 2014 Jul;29 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S623-31. doi: 10.1007/s11606-013-2680-1. J Gen Intern Med. 2014. PMID: 24715392 Free PMC article.
-
Multimethod evaluation of the VA's peer-to-peer Toolkit for patient-centered medical home implementation.J Gen Intern Med. 2014 Jul;29 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S572-8. doi: 10.1007/s11606-013-2738-0. J Gen Intern Med. 2014. PMID: 24715401 Free PMC article.
-
The effectiveness of quality improvement collaboratives in improving stroke care and the facilitators and barriers to their implementation: a systematic review.Implement Sci. 2021 Nov 3;16(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s13012-021-01162-8. Implement Sci. 2021. PMID: 34732211 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Understanding the components of quality improvement collaboratives: a systematic literature review.Milbank Q. 2013 Jun;91(2):354-94. doi: 10.1111/milq.12016. Milbank Q. 2013. PMID: 23758514 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
The impact of eHealth use on general practice workload in the pre-COVID-19 era: a systematic review.BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Sep 19;24(1):1099. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11524-9. BMC Health Serv Res. 2024. PMID: 39300456 Free PMC article.
-
International implementation of a care review process for mortality reviews: improving quality and safety virtually across the world.BMJ Open Qual. 2023 May;12(2):e002230. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2022-002230. BMJ Open Qual. 2023. PMID: 37253530 Free PMC article.
-
Continuous quality improvement at the frontline: One interdisciplinary clinical team's four-year journey after completing a virtual learning program.Learn Health Syst. 2022 Sep 27;6(4):e10345. doi: 10.1002/lrh2.10345. eCollection 2022 Oct. Learn Health Syst. 2022. PMID: 36263266 Free PMC article.
-
The role of quality improvement collaboratives in general practice: a qualitative systematic review.BMJ Open Qual. 2022 May;11(2):e001800. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2021-001800. BMJ Open Qual. 2022. PMID: 35589275 Free PMC article.
-
A cluster randomized controlled trial comparing Virtual Learning Collaborative and Technical Assistance strategies to implement an early palliative care program for patients with advanced cancer and their caregivers: a study protocol.Implement Sci. 2021 Mar 11;16(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s13012-021-01086-3. Implement Sci. 2021. PMID: 33706770 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Solimeo SL, Hein M, Paez M, Ono S, Lampman M, Stewart GL. Medical homes require more than an EMR and aligned incentives. Am J Manag Care. 2013;19(2):132–140. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
