Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Aug 1:96:36-43.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.03.080. Epub 2014 Apr 12.

Reduced self-referential neural response during intergroup competition predicts competitor harm

Affiliations

Reduced self-referential neural response during intergroup competition predicts competitor harm

M Cikara et al. Neuroimage. .

Abstract

Why do interactions become more hostile when social relations shift from "me versus you" to "us versus them"? One possibility is that acting with a group can reduce spontaneous self-referential processing in the moral domain and, in turn, facilitate competitor harm. We tested this hypothesis in an fMRI experiment in which (i) participants performed a competitive task once alone and once with a group; (ii) spontaneous self-referential processing during competition was indexed unobtrusively by activation in an independently localized region of the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) associated with self-reference; and (iii) we assessed participants' willingness to harm competitors versus teammates. As predicted, participants who showed reduced mPFC activation in response to descriptions of their own moral behaviors while competing in a group were more willing to harm competitors. These results suggest that intergroup competition (above and beyond inter-personal competition) can reduce self-referential processing of moral information, enabling harmful behaviors towards members of a competitive group.

Keywords: Intergroup competition; Medial prefrontal cortex; Self; Social cognition; fMRI.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
A) A schematic overview of the procedure. B) Examples of stimuli from the main experiment. C) Example of the picture-rating task for one target (independent pre-test rankings appear beneath each photo: 1 = most flattering to 6 = least flattering; participants in the current study did not see the rankings).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Left panel: Group mPFC ROI, based on self>other contrast in the localizer experiment (peak: −4, 34, −4, k = 377). Top right panel: correlation between spontaneous mPFC response to self>other moral behavior and willingness to harm competitors when competing alone, r(19) = .09, p = ns. Bottom panel: significant negative correlation between spontaneous mPFC response to self>other moral behavior and willingness to harm competitors when competing with the group, r(19) = −.44, p < .05.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bandura A. Moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanities. Personality and Social Psychology Review. 1999;3:193–209. - PubMed
    1. Cikara M, Botvinick MM, Fiske ST. Us versus them: Social identity shapes neural responses to intergroup competition and harm. Psychological Science. 2011;22:306–313. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cikara M, Bruneau EG, Saxe R. Us and them: Intergroup failures of empathy. Current Directions in Psychological Science. 2011;20:149–153.
    1. Cikara M, Van Bavel JJ. The neuroscience of intergroup relations: An integrative review. Perspectives on Psychological Science. in press. - PubMed
    1. Cohen TR, Montoya RM, Insko CA. Group morality and intergroup relations: Cross-cultural and experimental evidence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2006;32:1559–1572. - PubMed

Publication types