Functional status and quality of life after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a systematic review
- PMID: 24727842
- PMCID: PMC4039034
- DOI: 10.7326/M13-1316
Functional status and quality of life after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a systematic review
Erratum in
-
Correction: Functional Status and Quality of Life After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.Ann Intern Med. 2017 Dec 19;167(12):904. doi: 10.7326/L17-0416. Ann Intern Med. 2017. PMID: 29255862 No abstract available.
Abstract
Background: The functional and quality-of-life benefits of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) have not been established.
Purpose: To evaluate the changes in functional status and quality of life after TAVR.
Data sources: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from 1 January 2002 to 30 September 2013.
Study selection: Studies of TAVR that reported the New York Heart Association (NYHA) class, Short Form-12/36 Health Survey physical and mental component summary (points), or other measures of functional status.
Data extraction: Two reviewers independently extracted the mean change (follow-up minus baseline) in primary outcomes. Because of substantial heterogeneity, data were not pooled; the range of mean change was summarized.
Data synthesis: We identified 60 observational studies (56 pre–post comparison and 4 head-to-head comparative studies) and 2 randomized, controlled trials (11 205 patients). Most studies showed a clinically important decrease in NYHA class at 6 to 11 months (range, -0.8 to -2.1 classes) and 12 to 23 months (range, -0.8 to -2.1 classes). The improvement in the Short Form-12/36 Health Survey physical component score was clinically important over 12 months (range, 4.9 to 26.9 points), and the change in mental component score was smaller (range, 1.0 to 8.9 points).Clinically important improvements were seen in other disease-specific measures but were less consistently seen in general health measures.
Limitations: Comparative evidence is limited by few head-to-head studies. Survivor bias may have overestimated the benefits.
Conclusion: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement provides clinically important benefits in physical function and disease-specific measures of quality of life but modest benefits in psychological and general health measures. More comparative studies on functional status and quality of life are needed for informed treatment decision making.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Health Status After Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis at Increased Surgical Risk: Results From the CoreValve US Pivotal Trial.JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Aug 17;8(9):1207-1217. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.04.018. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015. PMID: 26292584 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Health Status Benefits of Transcatheter vs Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis at Intermediate Surgical Risk: Results From the PARTNER 2 Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA Cardiol. 2017 Aug 1;2(8):837-845. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2017.2039. JAMA Cardiol. 2017. PMID: 28658491 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Health-related quality of life after transcatheter aortic valve replacement in inoperable patients with severe aortic stenosis.Circulation. 2011 Nov 1;124(18):1964-72. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.040022. Epub 2011 Oct 3. Circulation. 2011. PMID: 21969017 Clinical Trial.
-
What is the best approach in a patient with a failed aortic bioprosthetic valve: transcatheter aortic valve replacement or redo aortic valve replacement?Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2015 Jun;20(6):837-43. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivv037. Epub 2015 Mar 8. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2015. PMID: 25754372 Review.
-
Beyond adding years to life: health-related quality-of-life and functional outcomes in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis at high surgical risk undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement.Curr Cardiol Rev. 2013 Nov;9(4):281-94. doi: 10.2174/1573403x09666131202121750. Curr Cardiol Rev. 2013. PMID: 24313648 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Evaluating the Sensitivity of Wearable Devices in Posttranscatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Functional Assessment.JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2024 Nov 8;12:e65277. doi: 10.2196/65277. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2024. PMID: 39514645 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Impact of the Hospital Frailty Risk Score on Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Late Elderly Patients.Cureus. 2024 Sep 8;16(9):e68922. doi: 10.7759/cureus.68922. eCollection 2024 Sep. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 39381490 Free PMC article.
-
Quality of life and functional capacity in patients after cardiac surgery intensive care unit.World J Cardiol. 2024 Aug 26;16(8):436-447. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v16.i8.436. World J Cardiol. 2024. PMID: 39221189 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Pre-procedural nursing home length of stay and outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement.J Am Geriatr Soc. 2024 Nov;72(11):3510-3519. doi: 10.1111/jgs.19124. Epub 2024 Aug 10. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2024. PMID: 39126234
-
Cardiac Health Assessment Using a Wearable Device Before and After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: Prospective Study.JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2024 Jun 3;12:e53964. doi: 10.2196/53964. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2024. PMID: 38832585 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Nkomo VT, Gardin JM, Skelton TN, Gottdiener JS, Scott CG, Enriquez-Sarano M. Burden of valvular heart diseases: a population-based study. Lancet. 2006;368(9540):1005–11. - PubMed
-
- Clark MA, Arnold SV, Duhay FG, Thompson AK, Keyes MJ, Svensson LG, et al. Five-year clinical and economic outcomes among patients with medically managed severe aortic stenosis: results from a Medicare claims analysis. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2012;5(5):697–704. - PubMed
-
- Schwarz F, Baumann P, Manthey J, Hoffmann M, Schuler G, Mehmel HC, et al. The effect of aortic valve replacement on survival. Circulation. 1982;66(5):1105–10. - PubMed
-
- Sundt TM, Bailey MS, Moon MR, Mendeloff EN, Huddleston CB, Pasque MK, et al. Quality of life after aortic valve replacement at the age of >80 years. Circulation. 2000;102(19 Suppl 3):III70–4. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources