Azithromycin versus doxycycline for the treatment of genital chlamydia infection: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
- PMID: 24729507
- DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciu220
Azithromycin versus doxycycline for the treatment of genital chlamydia infection: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Abstract
Background: There has been recent debate questioning the efficacy of azithromycin for the treatment of urogenital chlamydia infection. We conducted a meta-analysis to compare the efficacy of 1 g azithromycin with 100 mg doxycycline twice daily (7 days) for the treatment of urogenital chlamydia infection.
Methods: Medline, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, Cochrane reviews, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature were searched until 31 December 2013. Randomized controlled trials comparing azithromycin with doxycycline for the treatment of genital chlamydia with evaluation of microbiological cure within 3 months of treatment were included. Sex, diagnostic test, follow-up time, attrition, patient symptomatic status, and microbiological cure were extracted. The primary outcome was the difference in efficacy at final follow-up. Study bias was quantitatively and qualitatively summarized.
Results: Twenty-three studies were included evaluating 1147 and 912 patients for azithromycin and doxycycline, respectively. We found a pooled efficacy difference in favor of doxycycline of 1.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], -.1% to 3.1%; I(2) = 1.9%; P = .435; random effects) to 2.6% (95% CI, .5%-4.7%; fixed effects). Subgroup analyses showed that the fixed effects pooled efficacy difference for symptomatic men was 7.4% (95% CI, 2.0%-12.9%), and the random effects was 5.5% (95% CI, -1.4% to 12.4%).
Conclusions: There may be a small increased efficacy of up to 3% for doxycycline compared with azithromycin for the treatment of urogenital chlamydia and about 7% increased efficacy for doxycycline for the treatment of symptomatic urethral infection in men. However, the quality of the evidence varies considerably, with few double-blind placebo-controlled trials conducted. Given increasing concern about potential azithromycin failure, further well-designed and statistically powered double-blind, placebo-controlled trials are needed.
Keywords: azithromycin; doxycycline; genital chlamydia; meta-analysis; treatment efficacy.
© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Similar articles
-
Antibiotics for treating urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis infection in men and non-pregnant women.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jan 25;1(1):CD010871. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010871.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019. PMID: 30682211 Free PMC article.
-
The efficacy of azithromycin and doxycycline for the treatment of rectal chlamydia infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.J Antimicrob Chemother. 2015 May;70(5):1290-7. doi: 10.1093/jac/dku574. Epub 2015 Jan 29. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2015. PMID: 25637520 Review.
-
Safety and efficacy of WC2031 versus vibramycin for the treatment of uncomplicated urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis infection: a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled, multicenter trial.Clin Infect Dis. 2012 Jul;55(1):82-8. doi: 10.1093/cid/cis291. Epub 2012 Mar 19. Clin Infect Dis. 2012. PMID: 22431798 Clinical Trial.
-
Azithromycin versus doxycycline for genital chlamydial infections: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.Sex Transm Dis. 2002 Sep;29(9):497-502. doi: 10.1097/00007435-200209000-00001. Sex Transm Dis. 2002. PMID: 12218839
-
The case for further treatment studies of uncomplicated genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection.Sex Transm Infect. 2006 Aug;82(4):340-3. doi: 10.1136/sti.2005.019158. Sex Transm Infect. 2006. PMID: 16877590 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Efficacy of Single-Dose Azithromycin for Ocular Chlamydial Infection: A Longitudinal Study.Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2024 Mar 19;110(5):1010-1013. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.23-0540. Print 2024 May 1. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2024. PMID: 38507803 Free PMC article.
-
Trends in Chlamydia trachomatis Treatment Prescribing Practices in King County, Washington, 2010-2018.Sex Transm Dis. 2024 May 1;51(5):305-312. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000001940. Epub 2024 Jan 26. Sex Transm Dis. 2024. PMID: 38301622
-
Approche pratique au diagnostic et à la prise en charge de la chlamydia et de la gonorrhée.CMAJ. 2023 Sep 11;195(35):E1189-E1195. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.221849-f. CMAJ. 2023. PMID: 37696558 Free PMC article. Review. French. No abstract available.
-
Analysis of bacterial vaginosis, the vaginal microbiome, and sexually transmitted infections following the provision of menstrual cups in Kenyan schools: Results of a nested study within a cluster randomized controlled trial.PLoS Med. 2023 Jul 25;20(7):e1004258. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004258. eCollection 2023 Jul. PLoS Med. 2023. PMID: 37490459 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Phenotypic and Genotypic Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Chlamydia trachomatis Isolates from Patients with Persistent or Clinical Treatment Failure in Spain.Antibiotics (Basel). 2023 May 28;12(6):975. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12060975. Antibiotics (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37370294 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical

